Here are 100+ landing pages from top 1% of brands in the US and UK. We found over 856 hidden genius strategies that you can steal from them to become more profitable & grow even faster. Want it? 1. Like & RT this post (must do both) 2. Comment "Landing Pages" & I will DM you

A bike. A community. And $1.8 biilion in fitness eCommerce revenue Claim it before this post disappears. Here’s what you get: 𝗙𝘂𝗹𝗹 𝗣𝗲𝗹𝗼𝘁𝗼𝗻 𝗙𝘂𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗹 𝗕𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗸𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻: - 6 Category Entry Points - Pre-Sale Landing Pages - Advanced AOV & CRO Strategies - Editable Figma Templates - Psychographics - Full Funnel Breakdown - 9 Optimization Ideas - 56 Lowkey Genius Features If you want to have access to the full resolution: 1. Like this post 2. Comment "Peloton" (Must be following!) And I'll send it to you.

The 'In-House vs Agency' Exit Myth (What nobody tells you about acquisitions) Everyone says investors prefer in-house teams. After helping hundreds of top brands, I can tell you: That's BS. Let me break it down for you guys... 1. In-House Teams What happens: ↳ C-suite jumps ship first ↳ Brain drain is inevitable ↳ Minimal loyalty post-sale ↳ Key people leave after exit 2. Agency Partners What happens: ↳ Stay through transitions ↳ Focus on performance ↳ Bring specialized skills ↳ Scale with business 3. Why Investors Actually Prefer Agencies The math: ↳ Flexible scaling ↳ Lower fixed costs ↳ Access to experts ↳ Less HR headaches The fastest-growing brands use specialized agencies. Not bloated in-house teams. Don't believe it? Check any major exit from last 2 years. Count who stayed after 12 months. What are your thoughts on this?

@metrosukari Shared! Got it?

@JackBarnes53844 Check inbox! All good?

Most brands overlook their menu. Here’s how we used data-driven restructuring to make finding products easier—and boost conversions.

RT @theoscarhoole: In 1995, a single mom living on £4/day welfare wrote a book. 12 publishers rejected it. The 13th took it only because…

MYTH: Upsells in the cart always increase sales. Turns out, that’s not always true. We just ran a big A/B test for one of our clients that completely flipped the script on what most people believe about cart optimization. And the results? Pretty surprising—and potentially valuable for you. Here’s what we did: - 𝗥𝗲𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘂𝗽𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 from the cart drawer. - We hypothesized that 𝗳𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 = 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗽𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲𝘀. - Tested this setup against the control (a cart with upsells). The Results: - ARPU (Average Revenue Per User) increased significantly. - More customers finished their purchases without abandoning their cart. - Cart abandonment rates dropped. So, Why Did This Work? 1️⃣ 𝗧𝗼𝗼 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗖𝗵𝗼𝗶𝗰𝗲𝘀 = 𝗢𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗺 When you present shoppers with too many options, they can freeze. People come to the cart to buy what they’ve already decided on—extra suggestions can cause hesitation or second-guessing. 2️⃣ 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗙𝗼𝗰𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲 Without upsells, shoppers zeroed in on the value of their main purchase. No distractions, no second thoughts. 3️⃣ 𝗔 𝗖𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗻𝗲𝗿, 𝗦𝗺𝗼𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗖𝗵𝗲𝗰𝗸𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 A simple, distraction-free cart helps customers move through checkout faster and more confidently, making it easier to complete their purchases. But Here’s the Catch: This doesn’t mean upsells are bad. It just means they don’t work for every brand—or every audience. The real takeaway? 𝗧𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴. Sometimes less really is more, but you’ll never know what works for your customers unless you experiment. What works for one brand might flop for another, so don’t assume. Follow me for more CRO tips and insights!

We ran an A/B test that cost us €23,114.74. Here’s why psychological triggers backfired. Our hypothesis: If we prominently display the user's savings during a sale, conversion rates will increase. Why we thought this would work: - Limited-time offer - Red text to draw attention - "Your Advantage" messaging - Immediate visibility of savings - Hint that the advantage might not be available tomorrow The results: → Control: 60.4% CR, €28.57 Revenue Per User → Variant: 59.4% CR, €26.85 Revenue Per User → Overall loss: €23,114.74 (-6.0% revenue) What we learned: Psychological triggers don’t always work as expected: Despite using proven principles, the audience didn’t respond as planned. Context is everything: During sales, shoppers might not feel the same urgency around scarcity because there are so many deals available. Urgency can backfire: What we intended as a nudge to create urgency might have come across as overly pushy, which can hurt trust. Value is subjective: Highlighting savings doesn’t always match how customers perceive value—it’s more nuanced than just showing discounts. Attention doesn’t equal conversion: While the red text drew attention, it didn’t lead to desired actions. Key takeaway: Never assume. Always test. Even well-established psychological principles can fail in specific contexts. Follow me for more CRO insights like this.

@OMatsyshyn Dm'd you!

@BjoEcom Sent! Received?

@angelica_bisol5 Shared! Did you get it?

@babylon_invest Check inbox! All good?

@shedi_triq Sent your way!

@aekybs Shared! All good?

@nischalshahi15 Sent!

@KatAdrias DM'd you! all good?

@SaloniPunatar Shared! Got it?

@TheGreatfouad Sent!

@Charles92797922 Sent!

@MiskinHakim Delivered!