Marc J. Lajeunesse
@LajeunesseLab
Followers
2K
Following
3K
Statuses
802
Log driver of meta-analysis | R dev #metagear #juicr #switchboard & #OpenMEE | Ecol&Evol Prof @USouthFlorida | open courses https://t.co/pb8rR0KpQQ
Tampa, FL
Joined April 2016
@USouthFlorida has been planting many ornamental cycads 🌿 on campus and the result has been this wonderful explosion of 10,000s coontie hairstreaks this week!! ❤️🦋
0
0
1
RT @complete__pi: @smartereveryday Juicr is relatively easy to get the hang of. If using Mac, closing X11 really upsets R Studio, so make s…
0
1
0
@BellaLGonzalez @OAcevedoCharry Oh wow, was too busy to have a closer inspection at the time, but way cool!
0
0
1
RT @itchyshin: Very proud of @coraliewilliams 's first #PhD paper @MethodsEcolEvol ! Improving reporting of statistical simulation studies…
0
20
0
RT @LajeunesseLab: Meta-analysis is formal & explicit -- don’t get fooled by incomplete applications for synthesizing research But how do…
0
49
0
RT @Ed_pheasant: A couple of months ago a paper in @science used a "meta-analysis" to summarise the evidence on the success of conservatio…
0
12
0
RT @itchyshin: My first day @CityofEdmonton @UAlberta - here to create a Centre for Open Science & Synthesis in #Ecology & #Evolution. Look…
0
171
0
RT @ErreEspanol: 🔥El Paquete #R de la semana: #metagear ¡Descubre el paquete metagear para R! Facilita revisiones…
0
18
0
RT @Ed_pheasant: Engaged in an ecological meta-analysis? Employing Hedges g as your effect size measure? Explore my latest tool to gauge th…
0
20
0
RT @MatthewBJane: @JeffreyDahlke @bmwiernik @tobi_saueressig @BartosFra A couple masterpieces from @LajeunesseLab : {juicr} An R package t…
0
7
0
RT @MatthewBJane: Here is the ultimate thread of online resources for meta-analysis. Comment other resources and I will add them to this th…
0
119
0
Using the juicr package for R: maybe around R^2 = 0.0066 🍊 check out the YouTube vignette here: #rstats #dataviz
I've noticed it's becoming increasingly common in genomics to report results of regressions with ridiculously low correlation as "significant" based on a tiny p-value (for the hypothesis that the slope = 0). Can you guess R^2, the p-value, and where the data below was published?
0
4
33