The only correct response is calling for (1) a ceasefire and (2) investigations into both parties. Anything else is tacit or explicit complicity.

@KennethManusama Iedere analyse die dit niet meeneemt, en de desinformatie en vertekening in mainstream media die hieraan heeft bijgedragen, kan subiet de prullenmand in. En dat zijn er nu al veel.

@juliettemm Alternative hypothesis: anyone with a brain is deactivating their accounts here because fuck the white supremacists that run this place.

I can't in good conscience keep contributing to the business model of a white supremacist billionaire who just helped elect another white supremacist, so this is the last post on this account. Find me on BlueSky I guess or even better, in person.

@Alonso_GD @BrianCox_RLTW Jfc this is low even for the already low standards of this debate. Completely unwarranted and defamatory. Just block him, it's laudable to keep engaging but you're also a person with limited time.

@Willie_Zweegers @thijszonneveld Zelfs als dat zou kloppen, er wordt ook bezuinigd op sportverenigingen. Dus het wordt ouders ook moeilijker gemaakt om kinderen te laten sporten. En gym is ook essentieel om kinderen kennis te laten maken met verschillende sporten.

@Poesen_m Nah was a bit unfair of me, I knew we likely had a very similar view, just used it as an excuse to vent a bit

@TommyCarullo @TaraVanHo Yeah tell that to my Ukrainian friends, who's family is in mass grave now. Tankie.

@TommyCarullo @TaraVanHo Also, if you do not see how a Trump White House empowers authoritians worldwide I don't know what to tell you, other than to get your head out of your ass.

@TommyCarullo @TaraVanHo With Trump in the White House, enabling Putin and supporting Netanyahu, that would not even matter.

@TaraVanHo This whole election cycle is so terrifying and absurd from a European voter perspective. It is literally world-changing and we just have to stand and watch it happen, stomach in knots.

@TommyCarullo @TaraVanHo Calling for more genocide? As Trump has explicitly done?

@Alonso_GD @DavidLuban Rather than the parity that IHL presumes, here we have an asymmetrical exercise of state power over an individual. That to me says IHRL much more than IHL.

@Alonso_GD All true but I will say I find it difficult to go to bat for Sinwar here. Especially because in my view, it kind of distracts from far, far more egregious actions at the same time.

@Alonso_GD And this difference in terminology comes from its history: IHL developments are pushed by civil society actors (ICRC, UN) but codified by states. The rules and the rationales behind the rules come from different sets of actors.

RT @DrAlexGilder: You can now read my thoughts on how the law applies to the situation of UNIFIL including coverage of Israel's request for…