![KyrCynic Profile](https://abs.twimg.com/sticky/default_profile_images/default_profile_x96.png)
KyrCynic
@KyrCynic
Followers
125
Following
185
Statuses
18K
Joined May 2019
@erlikicinacik @PAOKGATE45 @Asindiricimadde @ragipsoylu The difference in your images is not because of Kastellorizo. The yellow area in the image below is what it adds to the Greek EEZ. Also it's is not a delimitation between Kastellorizo and Turkey but between Greece and Turkey. And Cyprus is irrelevant in that context.
0
0
0
@Orfe76_ @syl_sylv7966337 @ragipsoylu @Mr_Rio_ LOL. I know pretty well what a coastal state is and also what is international law and how it works. I won't be surprised if you have novel definitions for either. Turkey has already rewritten a few treaties and reinvented history. What are two lousy inconvenient definitions?
0
0
0
@Orfe76_ @syl_sylv7966337 @ragipsoylu @Mr_Rio_ Now, when one state tries to twist the arm of another with threats of use of force into agreeing to whatever, is absolutely contrary to international law and specifically the UN charter (which is also a contractual obligation of Turkey as a UN member).
1
0
0
@ecenbt @YANLIZCAMURAT @ragipsoylu Ok then, how about you entertain us with you in depth knowledge. Preferably with sources 🙄
0
0
0
@ecenbt @YANLIZCAMURAT @ragipsoylu No agreement is required with any country for extending territorial waters. And for the areas of overlap of the tw of two states the median line is considered the boundary in the absence of an agreement.
1
0
0
@ecenbt @YANLIZCAMURAT @ragipsoylu Agreement for what? Setting the breadth of territorial waters is a unilateral right of every coastal state. You of all people, as a "lawyer who specializes on intl law" should know that. It's none of Turkey's business. All it can do is threaten (which is also illegal)
0
0
0
@ecenbt @YANLIZCAMURAT @ragipsoylu Ok then, justify by international law why Marmara is an internal sea. There are specific conditions when that happens and they do not exist for Marmara.
0
0
1
@ecenbt @YANLIZCAMURAT @ragipsoylu Territorial waters is not something that needs enforcement. They are a unilateral right and they just exist. If Turkey choses to violate them is another matter and it won't be different that Turkey landing on Peloponnese.
0
0
0
@ecenbt @YANLIZCAMURAT @ragipsoylu Marmara sea is not an "inner sea". You will be amazed to learn that it also has international waters. Turkish waters are those 6nm from it's coasts. Maybe other countries can have the same claims that Turkey has within 12nm of Greek coasts.
1
0
0
@syl_sylv7966337 @ragipsoylu @Mr_Rio_ US has not ratified UNCLOS but for reasons other than maritime boundaries. It's own maritime borders are according to UNCLOS and has agreements to that end with it's neighbors.
1
0
1
@SarpedonB @NevbKLtJz6c066S The same way the court decided in the cases of Nicaragua-Colombia and Bahrein-Qatar where Colombia and Qatar were not parties to UNCLOS.
0
0
0
@oglumshakir @PAOKGATE45 @ragipsoylu If there is one thing worth fighting for is your sovereignty, and that is what Greece will be fighting for. You will fight for nothing.
0
0
1
@oglumshakir @PAOKGATE45 @ragipsoylu US does not? What makes you say that? US has agreements with Cuba and Mexico since the 70s and an arbitration with Canada. Israel also accepts UNCLOS as customary law. The UN resolution I previously mentioned only one country of all the UN members downvotes it, and that is Turkey
0
0
0
@NAppelaios Εϊναι το αντίστοιχο που λέγανε παλιά ότι είχαν ένα παιδί και μία κόρη; Απο ότι φαίνεται υπάρχουν οι άνθρωποι και οι γυναίκες. 🙄
0
0
0
@ecenbt @YANLIZCAMURAT @ragipsoylu As for the islands close to Turkey, if the distance is 24nm (2x12nm) or less the boundary is the middle line, exactly as it is today where the distance is 12nm (2x6nm) or less.
0
0
0