![ππππ’π¨π§ππ₯ πππ―π’ππ°π§β Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1874635458900078592/dz1iBbpB_x96.jpg)
ππππ’π¨π§ππ₯ πππ―π’ππ°π§β
@Krac3rjac
Followers
381
Following
19K
Statuses
21K
"Ignorance is the parent of fear.β β Herman Melville βFacts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.β β Aldous Huxley
Michigan
Joined November 2019
@BubbatheOG The Biden administration was a freak show. DEI is a quota system where straight White males go to the back of the line right behind straight White women regardless of their qualifications.
0
0
0
Monday, Feb 10, 2025 3:00 p.m.: Convene and proceed to executive session to resume consideration of the nomination of Tulsi Gabbard, of Hawaii, to be Director of National Intelligence. Watch live π #TulsiGabbard #DNI #Senate
0
0
0
In economics we often see a delay between an economic action and a consequence. This is known as a time lag. An impact of time lags is that the effect of policy may be more difficult to quantify because it takes a period of time to actually occur. Example of time lags: Change in interest rate (macro) Increase in level of investment (macro) Change in price of commodity (micro) Effect of devaluation (macro) (J-Curve effect)
0
0
0
@ExcellentWill @Rep_Stansbury Perhaps some biased liberal activist judges crossing the separation of powers line engaging in judicial tyranny could use some copies.
0
0
1
@Rep_Stansbury Exactly which laws were allegedly violated? You come across as a pretentious Rep. engaging in sophistry.
0
0
0
@theonlypeterkay Richard Gere is mischaracterizing and wrongly portraying Trump and his administration as authoritarians. Trump is not "a bully and a thug". Gere is not a scholar on authoritarianism, he's a biased political activist who is engaging sophistry.
0
0
0
The 14th Amendment was passed after the Civil War and subsequent to the 13th Amendment which abolished involuntary servitude (slavery). Post-Civil War reforms focused on injustices to African Americans. The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868 to protect the rights of native-born Black Americans, whose rights were being denied as recently-freed slaves. It was written in a manner so as to prevent state governments from ever denying citizenship to blacks born in the United States. But in 1868, the United States had no formal immigration policy, and the authors therefore saw no need to address immigration explicitly in the amendment.
0
0
0
@adamfc2000 @Kx3vjt1 @BerserkerSalty @Ronxyz00 @JDVance The original intent of the 14th Amendment was clearly not to facilitate illegal aliens defying U.S. law and obtaining citizenship for their offspring, nor obtaining benefits at taxpayer expense.
1
0
3
@Liz_Cheney @JDVance The "tyranny" is judicial tyranny from activists judges crossing the separation of powers line.
LAWYERβS PERSPECTIVE on the court issuing a TRO blocking Trumpβs DOGE employees access to Treasury Data @realDonaldTrump brought @elonmusk in under the reorganized USDS - now the US DOGE Service. As I chronicled elsewhere this was quite clearly legal and that action has not been challenged. What is being challenged is DOGE employees having access to Treasury Department Data Systems. Yesterday, a comprehensive complaint was filed before an Obama appointed judge in NY. The 60 page - fairly complex - complaint and request for TRO was filed yesterday and somehow U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer was able to fully vet this complaint and grant the TRO the same night. While granting a same day TRO does happen, it is quite impressive that he was able to research and rule on such a complex complaint in such a short period of time. Letβs talk about that TRO. @RealAlexJones @VigilantFox
0
0
0
Birthright Citizenship: A Fundamental Misunderstanding of the 14th Amendment Birthright Citizenship: A Fundamental Misunderstanding of the 14th Amendment The 14th Amendment doesnβt say that all persons born in the U.S. are citizens. It says that βall persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereofβ are citizens. That second, critical, conditional phrase is conveniently ignored or misinterpreted by advocates of βbirthrightβ citizenship. #BirthrightCitizenship #illegalimmigration Critics erroneously believe that anyone present in the United States has βsubjectedβ himself βto the jurisdictionβ of the United States, which would extend citizenship to the children of tourists, diplomats, and illegal aliens alike. But that is not what that qualifying phrase means. Its original meaning refers to the political allegiance of an individual and the jurisdiction that a foreign government has over that individual. (A citizen of another country)
0
0
0
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside." The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was intended to exclude American-born persons from automatic citizenship whose allegiance to the United States was not complete. With illegal aliens who are unlawfully in the United States, their native country has a claim of allegiance on the child. Thus, the completeness of their allegiance to the United States is impaired, which therefore precludes automatic citizenship. The original intent of the 14th Amendment was clearly not to facilitate illegal aliens defying U.S. law and obtaining citizenship for their offspring, nor obtaining benefits at taxpayer expense.
1
0
1
@adamfc2000 @BerserkerSalty @Ronxyz00 @JDVance Illegal aliens or migrants granted temporary status in the US should not get birthright citizenship. The 14th Amendment has been purposely misinterpreted.
Original intent of the 14th Amendment #BirthrightCitizenship #illegalimmigration The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads in part: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside." The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was intended to exclude American-born persons from automatic citizenship whose allegiance to the United States was not complete. With illegal aliens who are unlawfully in the United States, their native country has a claim of allegiance on the child. Thus, the completeness of their allegiance to the United States is impaired, which therefore precludes automatic citizenship. The original intent of the 14th Amendment was clearly not to facilitate illegal aliens defying U.S. law and obtaining citizenship for their offspring, nor obtaining benefits at taxpayer expense.
0
0
0
@AP So they're considered "far-right" because they advocate for saner immigration policies? How many migrants were in that alleged crowd of 200,000? The AP, The Associated Propaganda.
0
0
0
@ScottPresler @elonmusk And Congress should get Voter ID enacted via legislation now that Republicans control both houses of congress and the White House.
0
0
0