Here's a song supporting Roger Ver's @rogerkver fight for freedom. NO RIGHTS RESERVED - feel free to share, upload, or play this anywhere! Use #FreeRoger and visit to learn more and join the cause. Let's make this message loud and clear! 🔊🎵💡🔓

RT @JohnGaltBCH: Show your love for Bitcoin Cash BCH this Valentine's Day. Join Fiendish and Friends for a show with one of the developers…

Paying with Bitcoin Cash. At a large and quickly growing number of merchants. It's easy in the Phillipines and @_paytaca_ @joemar_taganna make it a reality. You guys rock & thank you Paul for showing how easy it is.

Yes. In addition, every ruling they have ever made should immediately be made null & void and all legal proceedings should be redone. And there should be severe consequences for the judge for their abuse of power.

It's amazingly beautiful to see a drop of water fall into a larger body of water. I never imagined it would look like this, cascading into the glass in multiple steps.

I encourage everyone to read this book. Hijacking Bitcoin will teach you the history everyone involved in Bitcoin should be aware of. Then make your choice. We will welcome you to Bitcoin Cash BCH any time. 我鼓励大家阅读这本书。《劫持比特币》将教会你每个参与比特币的人都应该了解的历史。然后做出你的选择。我们随时欢迎你加入比特币现金（BCH）。

RT @christinenews: ‘Bitcoin Jesus’ Roger Ver Asks Trump to End Lawfare

RT @kzKallisti: Look, I'm not even being arrogant here. BCH has survived every catastrophe and every bit of FUD you can possibly throw at…

Thanks for the honorary mention! To be clear, I am intrigued by the idea of a single payment consisting of lots of small, unlinked, payments on the blockchain. One utxo input, one output. But lots of transactions that are linked by the receiving wallet only. I'm not a fan of the email address style design, unless that can be made trustless and stored on-chain without the need of additional servers/services.

Thanks for the honorary mention! To be clear, I am intrigued by the idea of a single payment consisting of lots of small, unlinked, payments on the blockchain. One utxo input, one output. But lots of transactions that are linked by the receiving wallet only. I'm not a fan of the email address style design, unless that can be made trustless and stored on-chain without the need of additional servers/services.

@ryan_x_charles @FloweeTheHub Of course I can, but the registrar can cancel it on me. Even if I am the admin and owner contract, it can still be transferred away (eg a court order that the registrar must follow). I'm watching from the sidelines how you plan to address all these challenges.

I know its core to the earthbucks design, but I don't like the requirement of a crypto system to make any calls to a domain name. Some of the things I'd be worried about: 1) my request to the earthbucks server/service now has my IP address (or is some onion routing built in?), 2) it requires all sorts of additional infrastructure to be online, while I think it's unnecessary, 3) it requires a framework where signing certificates are trustless.

@FloweeTheHub @ryan_x_charles The bad user experience is only if the wallet doesn't link the payments. If the wallet "knows" and just shows it as one payment received it shouldn't have an effect on user experience. I'm intrigued, not yet convinced. CashFusion is another perfectly good option.

I wonder if you can't use Reusable Payment Addresses for the same effect. I have not looked into how they work, but my high level understanding is that you can generate an unlimited number of addresses from one RPA. And that noone can see these are linked, except for the owner of the RPA - he is able to find all payments. So just give one RPA instead of one Address and you're good to go. If would be nice if RPAs themselves have a hierarchy, where one set of addresses can be linked by the recipient, and an unlimited number of sets can be made from one rpa. Maybe that is possible, I don't know. Like I said, I'd need to understand how they work first.

Yes, in BCH cleanups can be done easily. And certainly there are scenarios where this is beneficial / wanted. I'm still thinking about a comment @ryan_x_charles made in one of his recent videos. If I can paraphrase, his idea is to keep lots of UTXOs and deliberately not consolidate them, if at all possible. So if I want to pay you 1 BCH, rather than sending you a transaction made up of 10 inputs, I will instead send you 10 transactions. Each will go to a different address of yours, from a different address of mine. So 1 in, 1 out. Or, sometimes, 1 in, 2 out. For change. Doing chain analysis then becomes almost impossible. Especially if your wallet is also in the habit of sending itself a utxo once in a while, and all others do the same. This idea is intriguing to me. And while it requires major changes to how wallets work, the network itself needs no upgrade.

These BTC transactions have about 1500 inputs and 1 output (2 if you are counting the fee, which is implicit). So yes, very easy to detect. Many of these inputs, if not all, were economically unspendable and would have been stored in the utxo set forever. Definitely not great, but a logical outcome of the fee market and limited block space. A miner isn't going to subsidize utxo consolidations and leave higher fee paying txs on the table.

Show your love for Bitcoin Cash BCH this Valentine's Day. Join Fiendish and Friends for a show with one of the developers we all love dearly... Mathieu Geukens.

RT @kzKallisti: The more you learn about #BCH💚 is the more you realize everything about it makes sense. UTXO-based design, algorithmic blo…

A CashToken can represent ownership of a real world asset. If you own a SOCK token, you have a decentralized claim on a pair of Cauldron Socks. What a fun way to show this property of CashTokens on Bitcoin Cash BCH. Watch Paul redeem his Token for his Real World Asset. 😂😂😂

Yes, audit the Federal Reserve, and Ron Paul is the man to do it.