Is the UK flooded with
#ECHR
violations?
Is the UK under a constant barrage of late night, 'pyjama injunctions' AKA Rule 39 orders?
Is the UK doing really badly protecting ECHR rights, constantly losing in Strasbourg?
THE LATEST STATS ARE OUT.
PREPARE FOR A SHOCK.
As the UK Parliament is debating whether Rwanda can be designated a 'safe third country' in law - the Irish High Court is now asked to decide whether the UK is a 'safe third country' for asylum seekers in practice because of the UK's policy.
🚨The UK is not a safe third country for asylum seekers according to Irish High Court.🚨
While the UK-Rwanda relationship loomed large in proceedings, judgment looks decided on the basis of the threat of the UK returning people to an unsafe country.
Delighted to tweet that I will be moving to King's College London to join the great team at UK in a Changing Europe.
Follow their leading work on the UK, the EU and beyond here:
@UKandEU
The fact that the most important Act of Parliament - fundamentally and permanently changing the UK's relationship with the EU & shifting power to the exec - will be passed in a single day is both the most astonishing fact about
#Brexit
and the most Brexit fact ever.
The UK continues to be one of the best performing states, and only improving since 2022.
In 2023, the European Court of Human Rights found the UK had violated rights in one case.
This is 38th lowest alongside Latvia and Luxemboug.
And this is the Telegraph's chief political correspondent Christopher Hope, explaining why Biden's great-great-great grandfather emigrating from Ireland during the Famine "could mean he is well disposed towards Great Britain".
Quick fact check here on BBC reporting of rule 39 orders.
The one order preventing removal of one person to Rwanda was issued 7.35pm UK time, and government were told before.
Bit early for pjs.
ECHR press release:
It is not possible for the
#ECHR
, or any court in UK or Strasbourg, to 'strike down' an Act of Parliament, and there is no Article in the
#ECHR
which prevents lawful deportation.
Find out about how the
#ECHR
works in the UK in this
@UKandEU
explainer
Why is the UK performing so well?
Experts (like
@alicedonald
) think it���s the way the UK has incorporated rights through the
#HumanRightsAct
.
You can see the impact in the no. of judgments against the UK since it came into force.
Best read with a double espresso from the great
@davidallengreen
- if not for enjoying the deft navigation of the litigation then for for that last paragraph spit-take.
1. If the Supreme Court finds against the Government, what part of the Rwanda policy do they find is unlawful - removing asylum seekers to any third country, or just to Rwanda?
Rule 39 orders against the UK continue to be rare.
In 2023, there was just one issued (in a case about expulsion to the US).
Since 2017, there have been 15 in total - an average of two per year. Compare this with Belgium (2050), Greece (298) and France (98) in the same period.
and 4. If the SC finds the policy is lawful, what the international reaction is.
In an unusual intervention, the UN voiced concern that the UK policy to remove asylum seekers to 3rd countries could set a precedent and undermine the international refugee system worldwide.
NB the Court of Appeal majority did not find removal to a safe 3rd country unlawful in principle, nor that Gov couldn't (with Parl approval) designate safe 3rd countries in practice.
Rather, the CA found it isn't safe *right now* in Rwanda for asylum claims to be processed.
The SC is the final court in the UK: there is no other place to go or appeal to make.
The driving force behind the Government's appeal to the SC is that, right now, Rwanda is the only country with which there is an agreement for removals.
No Rwanda, no removals.
The SC could decided differently, and on different grounds.
Key though, the SC will tackle the question of non-refoulement -the principle of intl, ECHR and refugee law that a person cannot be sent to a country they are unsafe- the SC will look to how the policy affects it.
After a reshuffle and with an election on the horizon, the PM is caught between party members pushing further right hard, and moderates' concern over publicly attacking UK institutions - judges and the courts - severely backfiring.
What he says (or not) will show his direction.
2. What the new Home Secretary says about the judgment.
It was widely expected that Braverman would use an unlawful judgment as a rallying cry for the UK to leave the ECHR - but what will Cleverly do?
Over the summer,
@alicedonald
and I had the privilege and delight of bringing together 50+ experts worldwide to author the
#Routledge
Handbook of Law and the
#COVID19
Pandemic.
The UK policy is that claims are processed in a 3rd country under that country's law (not UK law), and that refugees would also then *stay* in that country.
The UK law explicitly bans them from return, refugee or not.
As Foreign Secretary, Cleverly said he did not "feel in order to achieve what we need to achieve to protect our borders we are necessitated to leave the ECHR".
Will the sentiment stand now that he's taken on the illegal/irregular migration brief?
3. What the Prime Minister says about the judgment.
The Rwanda policy is a cornerstone of his promise to 'stop the boats', and necessary for the operation of key parts of the
#IllegalMigrationAct
.
An unlawful judgment could stall or even stop both.
Other countries in Europe will be looking at the UK as concerns on migration take over public debate.
The UK policy is different than other policies seen so far, e.g. new plans in Italy would see claims processed in Albania, but successful claimants would then move to Italy.
As we almost reach halfway through
@Verfassungsblog
@DemocracyR
"COVID-19 and States of Emergency" - a thank you to our absolutely *PHENOMENAL* contributors who have helped us represent >70 countries, and consider
#COVID19
laws affecting ~78% of global population.
*Thank You*
Last
@BBCNews
appearance with the great
@RobertCraig3
before 9pm, and then speaking with
@brentgofftv
on
@dwnews
@ 9.45 (10.45).
And then, dear reader, to bed on a *momentous* day for the UK constitution. Thank you for listening to me.
We're currently working on
@UKandEU
explainer on the
#Rwanda
asylum policy, Treaty and Bill but a quick first observation.
The Treaty requires Rwanda to follow its int'l obligations; the Bill removes the UK's obligations to follow theirs*.
Ever thought "gosh, sure wish where Brexit is at could be explained with cartoons and post-it notes in under 2 minutes and 30 seconds"?
Well! DO WE HAVE SOMETHING FOR YOU!
Here's a simple explanation of what's ahead for
#Brexit
in 2020.
It's worth breaking down why leaving the
#ECHR
would not 'stop the boats'.
This is leaving to one side the *much greater* consequences for the UK if it did so, entirely unrelated to migration and asylum.
[Every day in Brexit as a Legal Academic]
*Type 1,000 words analysing current state of the law, assessing probability of different outcomes*
*Look at News*
*Laugh*
*Cry*
*Delete*
*Delete*
*Delete*
To the student who put their head in their hands when I said, 'after Brexit, supremacy will and won't exist - so you'll still have to study EU law, but it'll just be more complicated.'
... I'm with you, student, I'm with you.
As I sit writing the final post for
@Verfassungsblog
@DemocracyR
COVID-19 and States of Emergency, I am awestruck by the breadth, quality & volume of the analyses: all credit to the *incredible* work of >100 contributors & two brilliant editors,
@sinthiou_1
& Evin Dalkilic.
Further detail here: of the 1,014 judgments issued by the European Court of Human Rights in 2023 - only 3 concerned the UK, and only one found a rights violation.
The case was also about the right to privacy, not asylum: {%22itemid%22:[%22001-226468%22]}
The UK continues to be one of the best performing states, and only improving since 2022.
In 2023, the European Court of Human Rights found the UK had violated rights in one case.
This is 38th lowest alongside Latvia and Luxemboug.
I'm a little worried that new followers since yesterday will be disappointed to find that I mainly tweet cartoons on sticky notes.
Speaking of -
#Prorogation
in post-its.
I've been testing a hypothesis, which has so far proven so accurate that it could be a working theory.
Anyone at a meeting on zoom in pandemic is no more than 2m/6ft from laundry.
This reduces to 60cms/2ft if you're an academic giving a lecture.
Prove me wrong, twitter.
While the court emphasised that they considered only the legal question, they implicitly tackled the political debate head-on by highlighting that leaving the ECHR won’t remove the principle from UK law (and the Courts).
Final day
@MDXlaw
.
I'm sure my friends & nevertheless colleagues would be too embarassed for me to tweet how much joy it has been.
I'd certainly not highlight their dedication to research, education & their students.
@alicedonald
@ProfPech
@lughaidhk
would be just mortified.
Marking 50 years since Ireland and the UK’s accession to the EU, and 3 years since Brexit, read the collected commentaries from the series first published on
@Verfassungsblog
, in collaboration with
@UKandEU
&
@UCDLawSchool
.
Delighted, privileged and otherwise excited to join dear friends and brilliant colleagues as a Research Fellow at
@CEUDemInst
#RuleofLaw
Group led by the inimitable force of
@ProfKochenov
.
I don't think anyone should take talk of leaving the
#echr
seriously.
Not only for how hard it would be for the current government, the fact it would not as a policy "stop the boats", or for the int'l or nat'l consequences for the UK.
But here again are the SHOCKING ECHR STATS.
Is the UK flooded with
#ECHR
violations?
Is the UK under a constant barrage of late night, 'pyjama injunctions' AKA Rule 39 orders?
Is the UK doing really badly protecting ECHR rights, constantly losing in Strasbourg?
THE LATEST STATS ARE OUT.
PREPARE FOR A SHOCK.
Wishing the very best of luck to all our
@MDXlaw
students with their
#EULaw
exam next week!
If you remember nothing else - *THE ECHR IS NOT AN EU TREATY*.
Just trying to relax from exam marking duties by watching 📺 only to see legendary
@MDXlaw
brexitologist Dr
@JoelleGrogan
discuss forthcoming horror 🎞️ known as no-deal Brexit 2.0 on
@BBCNews
😟😱
Confused about what's happening with the Rwanda policy?
➡️Here's my
@UKandEU
explainer with
@alicedonald
on the UK-Rwanda Treaty and the Rwanda Bill: what they do and don't do, their likely impact, and why they are so controversial to all sides.
The
#RwandaBill
is splitting the Conservatives, likely to face a tough challenge in passing through the Lords, and could *still* face legal challenges.
Why? Here are 7 reasons that the Bill is causing controversy.
For those waking early to hear news of the Supreme Court judgment today - I'll be outlining the essentials on
@BBCBreakfast
at 6.10am, and on
@BBCRadioWales
at 6.30am.
1. The UKSC emphasised that it is *not* (only) the ECHR, but also several international treaties, and several Acts of Parliament in national law which embed the principle of non-refoulement.
Will be raising a virtual glass to
@ProfPech
of the eponymous 'Pech v Council' GC decision yesterday now providing an essential precedent for transparency and public access to documents behind decision-making.
🥂to him & his legal team!
📣🥳 Excited to mark the launch of
@GoodLobbyProfs
bringing together >60 academics to tackle critical challenges to the
#ruleoflaw
.
Led by my friend and nonetheless co-director
@ProfPech
and based at the brilliant
@TheGoodLobby
with
@alemannoEU
.
Join our event & get in touch!
After months of preparation, The Good Lobby Profs network is live! 👏
🗓️Join us on March 22nd at 12PM to discover the project & discuss the threats to the
#RuleOfLaw
in Europe.🇪🇺
👉For more information and registration follow the link:
#Throwback
to our very first explainer - the Miller
#Article50
#Brexit
case - published 5 years ago today!
We've come a long way (especially our font) since then.
If
#prorogation
advice is found unlawful next week, the most challenging 'leap' for the Supreme Court will be the question of remedies.
*Highly recommend* reading the great
@jeff_a_king
on this:
& see
@RobertCraig3
on Art IX
Absolute joy and an honour to speak at my college
@OrielOxford
on the rule of law, the place where I first read about it, and to deliver the Floreat Oriel toast.
📝 Does the rule of law in the EU have a core meaning, or is it subjected to ambiguous interpretation depending on our (supra)national understanding?
Find out more in the blog post
@JoelleGrogan
@ProfPech
@MDXlaw
and working paper
2. The UKSC were convinced by the UN’s evidence of the situation on the ground in Rwanda.
UN evidence underlined a poor
#humanrights
record and systemic issues: lack of legal advice, concerns for judicial independence, and no appeal of a decision on record.
1/ I talked
#prorogation
on
@BBCNews
this morning from a
@MDXlaw
colleague's office, with another lecturer's jacket on. I think few seriously considered this happening. I didn't.
(...even if I had drawn
@stickytrickylaw
post-its, I still thought - )
Almost entirely certain that I'll soon be a morality tale on why you should never go on radio to discuss Brexit with jetlag and a cold. NEVERTHELESS!
I'll be chatting with the wonderful
@PhilWilliams
tonight after 10.30pm, and try (my best) to navigate through today's votes.
Over the past 12 weeks, I had the joy and privilege of working with the incomparable
@Verfassungsblog
team and 100+ contributors worldwide to bring together the
#PowerandPandemic
Symposium.
In the run up to the publication of the
#Routledge
Handbook of Law and the COVID-19 Pandemic,
@alicedonald
& I will be highlighting our exceptional authors.
First, the great
@DemocracyTalk
writing on the future of global
#democracy
.
Set deadline for final assignment as last Friday in March (as usual) - this year it's the 29th.
Certainly increased the drama of exams when I announced "YOU MUST SUBMIT YOUR LAST EU LAW ESSAY BEFORE THE UK LEAVES THE EU."
About a year ago I was getting very damp outside the Supreme Court talking about the UK's constitutional upheaval.
Glad things have calmed down since and I can continue to enioy my annual leave.
With astonishing, if not jaw-dropping, speed
@MDXlaw
⭐️
@ProfPech
delivers his opinion of the Court of Justice’s interim relief order against Poland's "⭐️-Chamber" in Commission v Poland.
The order was handed down **yesterday**.
Winning legal battles is important in the fight for the EU rule of law against Poland, but winning the fight is something different.
LAURENT PECH on the ECJ injunction against the "disciplinary chamber" and the refusal of the COM to face up reality.
Talking the significance for Brexit of today's votes on
@BBCNews
after 7pm, and answering questions on what's next after 8pm on
@bbc5live
.
For those who need an early night after it all - I'll also be explaining what this means tomorrow morning after 6am on
@BBCBreakfast
.
Delighted to speak today on resilience & sustainability of rule of law in the EU, and joining leading experts to celebrate the wonderful Professor
@BardPetra
.
Privileged (and excited) to be along with
@RobertCraig3
again tomorrow throughout the day on
@BBCNews
, and to take stock at c.8.30pm of what will be (no matter what) a momentous judgment.
I am due to be on BBC News tomorrow at various points all day from 0900 and most likely doing the c.8.30pm slot with
@JoelleGrogan
(nothing confirmed yet).
Following his article arguing for
#ECHR
withdrawal, listen in to Lord Sumption and myself discuss the legal steps and consequences for the UK in the latest Spectator podcast.
Joining chapter co-author and real tennis player
@ProfPech
this morning
@EU_Commission
to launch 📖 'Human Rights Law and Evidence-Based Policy: the Impact of the EU's Fundamental Rights Agency' edited by Rosemary Byrne & Han Entzinger.
@EURightsAgency
#FRA
"Laurent Pech, a professor of European law at
@MiddlesexUni
, said a Polish ruling against ECJ supremacy would amount to "a nuclear strike against the EU legal order" as it "would not be dis-applying an ECJ judgment [as in the German case] but EU treaty provisions"."
In this
@UKandEU
explainer, find out what the
#ECHR
is, how it is enforced, and how the UK could leave - along with some pretty major international consequences.
Today was my last EU lecture and last teaching of the academic year. It was (appropriately) on Brexit.
I'm sure I share with many colleagues the feeling of how surreal it is to wake in the morning and be unsure what will be in the afternoon's lecture.