Jingles
@JinglesBTC
Followers
2K
Following
100K
Statuses
53K
#Bitcoin #Hodl. I enjoy imaginary internet money built on products that don’t exist with business plans that don’t make sense so I can Stack Sats 🦆
Joined December 2011
@guyontheearth @PakoVM @JoeCarlasare "mAtHeMaTiCs, lEsS sUpLy, mOrE dEmAnD, lOwEr pRiCe". That's all thats needed.
0
0
0
@Cabriolex @rodarmor I mean Satoshi had an explicit limit on the size of blocks from the very first release. If they were larger than 32MiB, they’d be considered invalid.
0
0
1
2
0
0
@EricRosso23 @TheVladCostea Go fish, good thread too.
@brian_trollz @Keebinhand Explicit 32mb limit but the database 1000 lock limit meant much lower than 1mb.
1
0
0
@EricRosso23 @TheVladCostea You’re actually fully dunning kruger. Satoshi slipped in the 1mb limit without telling anyone. Blocks were mostly empty then. Now I’m going to insult you. You’re fucking dumb.
1
0
0
@EricRosso23 @TheVladCostea I’m not accepting these comments from someone that didn’t know there was a blocksize limit when bitcoin was released 😂
0
0
0
@EricRosso23 @TheVladCostea It was released with a block size, and the BerkeleyDB issue meant it could never be reached anyway. Blocks barely had any tx’s at all at that time. You saying he introduced it to slow down people spending their money is stupid. This is enough now.
1
0
1
@EricRosso23 @TheVladCostea Read it, reads like it was written by someone that doesn’t know what was happening at the time. Putting in a 1mb block size wasn’t limiting anything at the time, except the possibility of major spamming and causing node runners a headache.
2
0
1
@EricRosso23 @TheVladCostea What logic shows Satoshi was killed and replaced? He was bootstrapping the network. Blocks were extremely small and unused then, logic shows you’re just making this up to cover for your feelings. This vortex around you is concerning bro.
3
0
2
@guyontheearth @PakoVM @JoeCarlasare You’re describing less supply and more demand means lower value.
1
0
1
@EricRosso23 @TheVladCostea You need to make up your mind. Either consensus is or isn’t part of Bitcoin.
1
0
0
@EricRosso23 @TheVladCostea Prove what? Nothing I’ve said is controversial. You on the other hand have said Satoshi was killed and replaced by a bad actor that put the 1mb blocksize limit in. 😂
1
0
0
@EricRosso23 @TheVladCostea >He wanted it to be a coin/network that we govern. Not governments, or banks. "A system steered with consensus, where the majority are "right" regardless." Thanks for agreeing. I'm muting now, you're clearly dealing with some things right now.
1
0
0