@Angry_Potato__ @Pearl_Donut @TezzaLap @Docstockk That you seek to simply dismiss this subject by labelling me to justify your “position” is sad but expected.

@Pearl_Donut @TezzaLap @Docstockk You are boringly repetitive, who would have thought it.

@Justmoi90995439 @Serena_Partrick @Glinner Are you seriously asking that? Where to start… Testicular cancer Prostate cancer Severe trauma or injury Testicular torsion Chronic pain or infection

@Pearl_Donut @TezzaLap @Docstockk It’s all in the public domain, you just don’t want to acknowledge its existence. And no, I’m not doing your homework for you because even if I did you would still deny it. But by al means carry on as you are a textbook science denier and a great exemplar to show people.

@Serena_Partrick Sadly, most of what I am reading here is self righteous posturing. Flashback to the era of peak homophobia. Making a judgement based solely on the story of the individual who is painting themselves as the victim is just affirming their victimhood.

@XGEN01X @anugent514 @holyroodmandy @Snowy273 …cross examine. In this case NC called the spouse which is what gave JR the opportunity to cross which she rightfully took advantage of. So possible strategic error by NC.

@notwheeshting @holyroodmandy Shameful? JR & NC are professionals doing the jobs that they are paid to do, that’s how litigation works. If you believe that calling the hb was a mistake that’s the responsibility of NC making a strategic error which JR used to advantage. Would you complain if it were reversed?

@Hamfra43 @AGallagherAlly Have you heard the saying “There are lies, there are damn lies and then there are statistics.” Case in point.

@kellythe4th @AGallagherAlly You do know that in the UK there is no law (and never has there been) that mandates who can or cannot use any particular public toilet. What does exist are laws concerning behaviours in all public spaces and these apply to everyone in any public space.

@Pearl_Donut @TezzaLap @Docstockk …contended by myself, but when you look at the original NC statement the assertion that you need both a large gamete person AND a small gamete person is contentious, because, e.g., as the work has shown a large gamete can be “produced” from cells of a small gamete producer.

@Pearl_Donut @TezzaLap @Docstockk What, not waiting for the next instalment? Don’t worry, I don’t think your gametes will be in demand, or any cell in your body. Ta ta.

@TezzaLap @Pearl_Donut @Docstockk You must have a humiliation fetish, you are getting embarrassing. Somatic cells (e.g., skin cells) were taken from male mice (which have XY chromosomes). These cells were converted into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)—capable of developing into any cell type. Following?

@TezzaLap @Pearl_Donut @Docstockk Yes you did say something stupid. You science deniers are all the same, stuck in your grade school text books bc science stopped when you left school. Never mind.

@TezzaLap @Pearl_Donut @Docstockk …germ cells which are direct precursors to sperm and eggs. The technology as always is in advance of the ethical considerations. You can believe it or not as you wish but it’s still true. And that’s only what is public knowledge.