RT @DiedSuddenly_: Can't decide if Bill Gates belongs in a mental institution or federal prison

RT @libsoftiktok: JUST IN: The Attorney Generals of Washington State, Oregon, and Minnesota filed a joint lawsuit against Trump following h…

@Nero Cause it is?

@Babygravy9 What about tranny porn? That was heavily pushed on 4chan as well.

RT @Chadwick_Moore: The Associated Press has taken over $52 Million of government money

RT @Breaking911: 👀 Reuters was paid millions of dollars by the US government for “large scale social deception”. That is literally what i…

RT @DefiyantlyFree: Matt Perna went inside the capital amidst of a giant crowd. He had no weapons. He entered through an open door in the m…

@RichardGrenell Dude, know your audience. Now is not the time to be calling for funding elitist pet projects.

@CollinRugg Watch it again. The driver wasn't even in a hurry to walk back to the truck. They were oblivious to the train coming.

@Rep_Clyde Let us know when that's "filed articles of impeachment". "Drafting" is meaningless. Might as well be one of those strongly-worded letters the GOP is so famous for.

@elonmusk All the people running around trying to protect their own sacred cow at USAID, saying "It's the military budget, why isn't DOGE over there?!!!?" Well, here you go. No government agency is safe from DOGE. Everyone gets a turn in the barrel.

My typical interaction with ChatGPT: I ask ChatGPT, "Who is running Syria?" ChatGPT: "blah blah Assad." I'm pretty sure that's wrong, so I look it up elsewhere, verify it's wrong. I ask ChatGPT again, "I thought Assad stepped down." ChatGPT: "nope, he's still in charge." I ask ChatGPT how current it's data is on the subject. ChatGPT: "oh, sorry, you're right, he stepped down. I'll do better next time". AI is worthless if it can't be trusted to do as good of a job as Google Search for basic research.

I'm pretty sure you people are braindead. He didn't say there were people ALIVE at 150 getting bennies, he said there were bennies being handed out to names of people in the system who - IF ALIVE - would be 150. Clearly there are no 150-year olds alive, which was the entire point. There are people happily and fraudulently collecting benefits for dead people.

RT @shellenberger: Last week, we reported that the CIA and a USAID-run front group, OCCRP, were behind Trump’s 2019 impeachment. Now, a new…

@SenatorWicker Do the staffers that run the SM accounts for politicians ever report back to them how badly they are slammed online for their nonsense?

@BasedMikeLee Bigger question - would you be surprised? I wouldn't be, but I've grown to expect the worst from our government.

If I wanted an autonomous car, I'd choose a private entity as well, but unless one private entity controls 100% of the vehicles on the road, there's no system where cars could be completely autonomous with no traffic signs or signals. Short-term, it's going to continue to get better, but only because the cars are obeying the existing traffic laws as programmed into them, necessary to coexist with legacy. Your long-term of all cars being completely autonomous to the point where they are just all able to sense each other and operate without signals and rules is decades away. Accelerating that goal by banning human driving isn't freedom. There will be some point in the future where the vast majority of cars will be autonomous. When that time comes, we'll likely have some sort of solution where the legacy cars that remain will be able to coexist with the autonomous system. Think of how the current road system is 99.9% cars/trucks and we've made allowances for horse/buggy to remain possible. It took around 60 years between the invention of the car and the federal highway act, which shifted infrastructure planning to being focused on car travel. This is arguably a much more significant and complex change to make than horse to car.

@GuntherEagleman @libsoftiktok If you looked up Uniparty in the dictionary, you'd see a picture of Mitch.

@johnrich Zero chance Republicans are all clean on this issue, especially the ones on the boards of the main NGO's at the center of all of it. They're hoping judges will block everything so they can hide.

@catturd2 Nope, or they wouldn't be Democrats. Not because they wouldn't want to be, but the rest of the cabal would push them out if they weren't just as dirty.