It never crosses these men's minds that it might cause women deep distress 1) to be denied their own spaces and categories, 2) to find their male 'allies' don't care, and 3) to only get these rights restored because men who don't care about women either saw it as an open goal

Women kept as slaves on HUMAN egg farm: 100 victims are fed hormones and treated like cattle, with eggs removed and sold each month by gangsters

@J42doc

This 'why do you care about a tiny fraction of the population?' line is, and always was, utterly ridiculous. Gender ideology has undermined freedom of speech, scientific truth, gay rights, and women's and girls' safety, privacy and dignity. It's also caused irreparable physical damage to vulnerable kids. Nobody voted for it, the vast majority of people disagree with it, yet it has been imposed, top down, by politicians, healthcare bodies, academia, sections of the media, celebrities and even the police. Its activists have threatened and enacted violence on those who've dared oppose it. People have been defamed and discriminated against for questioning it. Jobs have been lost and lives have been ruined, all for the crime of knowing that sex is real and matters. When the smoke clears, it will be only too evident that this was never about a so-called vulnerable minority, notwithstanding the fact that some very vulnerable people have been harmed. The power dynamics underpinning our society have been reinforced, not dismantled. The loudest voices throughout this entire fiasco have been people insulated from consequences by their wealth and/or status. They aren't likely to find themselves locked in a prison cell with a 6'4" rapist who's decided his name's now Dolores. They don't need state-funded rape crisis centres, nor do they ever frequent high street changing rooms. They simper from talk show sofas about those nasty far-right bigots who don't want penises swinging around the girls' showers, secure in the knowledge that their private pool remains the safe place it always was. Those who've benefited most from gender identity ideology are men, both trans-identified and not. Some have been rewarded for having a cross-dressing kink by access to all spaces previously reserved for women. Others have parlayed their delicious new victim status into an excuse to threaten, assault and harass women. Non-trans-identified leftybros have found a magnificent platform from which to display their own impeccably progressive credentials, by jeering and sneering at the needs of women and girls, all while patting themselves on the back for giving away rights that aren't theirs. The actual victims in this mess have been women and children, especially the most vulnerable, gay people who've resisted the movement and paid a horrible price, and regular people working in environments where one misplaced pronoun could see you vilified or constructively dismissed. Do not tell me this is about a tiny minority. This movement has impacted society in disastrous ways, and if you had any sense, you'd be quietly deleting every trace of activist mantras, ad hominem attacks, false equivalence and circular arguments from your X feeds, because the day is fast approaching when you'll want to pretend you always saw through the craziness and never believed it for a second.

‘I sometimes resent the fact that we had to pay an uncomfortably large amount of money for something that literally everyone has a right to, and most don’t need to pay for.’ Literally no one has the right to a child. No one has the right to buy a baby.

Bianca Censori comes from a well off family. Was privately educated at a top Melbourne school. Did extremely well and obtained a degree in Architecture from the University of Melbourne. Smart, beautiful, well loved and now …. ??? … I don’t understand at all. Kanye is 🤮🤮

"Sex not part of woman’s ‘marital duties,’ court rules in divorce case. A French woman took her case to the European Court of Human Rights after she was ruled at fault in her divorce because she had stopped having sex with her husband. In 2015, she petitioned to the Versailles High Court for divorce on the grounds of fault, alleging that her husband had prioritized his career over family life and been bad-tempered and insulting, according to an ECHR statement. He counterclaimed, arguing that she had made slanderous accusations against him and “failed to fulfill her marital duties.” "The divorce was granted in November 2019 by the Versailles Court of Appeal, with the fault attributed to the woman on the basis that not having sex with her husband constituted a “serious and repeated breach of marital duties and obligations, making it impossible to continue in a state of matrimony,” the ECHR said. She appealed the case within France but was rejected, and in March 2021, she took it to the human rights court. In Thursday’s ruling, a panel of judges found that “the very existence of such a marital obligation ran counter to sexual freedom.” “In the Court’s view, consent to marriage could not imply consent to future sexual relations. Such an interpretation would be tantamount to denying that marital rape was reprehensible in nature,” the court said in a statement. It also noted that “the concept of ‘marital duties’ … took no account whatsoever of consent to sexual relations.” In a statement released by the French women’s rights organization Women’s Foundation, the woman described the decision as a victory “for all women who, like me, find themselves confronted with aberrant and unjust legal decisions, calling into question their bodily integrity and their right to privacy.” The decision is expected to have cascading legal implications in France, as ECHR rulings are binding on member states. It comes amid a national reckoning over consent laws following the high-profile case of Dominique Pelicot, 72, who was found guilty of drugging his then-wife, Gisèle Pelicot, and inviting dozens of men to his home to abuse her. Women’s rights groups in France hailed the ruling. “Respect for human dignity must prevail over all archaic interpretations by French judges,” said Emmanuelle Piet, president of the Feminist Collective Against Rape. The woman’s attorneys, Lilia Mhissen and Delphine Zoughebi, said in a joint statement that the ruling is a “major development for women’s right to control their bodies, including within the framework of marriage.” Zoughebi told The Washington Post that the decision means marriage is no longer “sexual servitude.” “It’s not written in the French law that you must have sexual relations when you are married, but judges in France are saying this,” she said. “Now with this decision, they can’t say that anymore.”"

@WombsNotForRent "A two year warranty". How cheap life has become. You'd think they were discussing buying a used car.

CBC refers to Mohamed Ballouz, who murdered his wife and children, as a woman and uses "she/her" pronouns for him because he decided after he killed them to identify as a woman. Interestingly, they did not use his photo in the article. It's almost as if they don't want the public to see what self-identification laws have led to in Canada. #NotOurCrimes

I’m genuinely confused by how the U.S. Government has decided to shut down TikTok, yet has failed to do the same for the P*rnhub crime scene despite overwhelming evidence the site has intentionally globally distributed and monetized the child abuse and rape of countless victims.