@stackerco @LuketheLawyer1 @ThoughtfulSaint Ish*

@LuketheLawyer1 @stackerco @ThoughtfulSaint In some sense yes.

@stackerco @LuketheLawyer1 @ThoughtfulSaint Mainline LDS that is (I am Strangite)

@stackerco @LuketheLawyer1 @ThoughtfulSaint Or speaking as the lord in any manner.

@stackerco @LuketheLawyer1 @ThoughtfulSaint 1. Because just as the saviour was tempted harsher then others, the higher the role the bigger grab you are for satan 2. Agency, you can still be led by fools, as Ephesians says. 3. Same as above, and they hold the keys to ordinances.

@stackerco @LuketheLawyer1 @ThoughtfulSaint 4. Infallibility doctrine removes agency

@DennisBowden18 @mosmoot Because everyones needs different forms of wisdom (experiences) to receive the growth they needed for exaltation.

@pimomormon @FirmesConstante @rustylied @NoDisassemble5 I’m currently independent but lean Strangite. But really am still studying.

@pimomormon @FirmesConstante @rustylied @NoDisassemble5 Because principle stays the same. Plus I’m not LDS.

@rustylied I mean I could imagine some low tier apologists use it.

@pimomormon @FirmesConstante @rustylied @NoDisassemble5 Yes, as I said Joseph warned of change in principle. He was fine, and even instructed Brigham to make many changes, for example the endowment in red brick store, and then in Nauvoo were worded differently yet both instructed by JS so I don’t think he cared about the linguistics

@pimomormon @FirmesConstante @rustylied @NoDisassemble5 Considering Smith commanded Brigham to “Organise and systemise” the endowment, and then later said only the principles should be kept the same, I’m led to believe changes in ordinances don’t constitute changes in the principles of covenants made.

@jaredadairbell I wonder which is explicitly said to be the foundation of the church?

@ChinoBlanco The issue isn’t the sermons, it’s the ahistorical sensationalism found in the film as a whole.

@Rultpwr @GrayM0untain It’s part of their elaborate cover up to pretend they’re not gay