The Conservative Cunt
@FuckThaDems
Followers
142
Following
2K
Statuses
2K
Joined November 2022
@RepJeffries Quit listening to dumb people! These democrats only want to divide and propagandize us 🇺🇸
0
0
0
@CalltoActivism This really complicates the narrative the Elon is doing this to enrich himself 🇺🇸
0
0
0
@CBSNews Should we close schools and shut the economy down?!? Fire people for not taking the flu vaccine?!?
1
0
4
@ChollyGee @acnewsitics Naw brah, conman give preemptive pardons to their whole family. Do your own homework 🇺🇸
1
0
0
@SenSchumer Quit listening to stupid people! The Democrats are all about dividing and propagandizing Americans 🇺🇸
0
0
0
@CalltoActivism Automation can fill the void on most and if you aren’t getting San marzanos, you ain’t living!
1
0
0
@RepJeffries Yall are on the side that puts political opponents in prison, Mandela would have voted Trump🇺🇸
0
0
2
Here are some examples of waste and fraud that have been highlighted by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) according to information available on the web: - **Unnecessary Contracts:** DOGE has canceled $420 million in unnecessary contracts, suggesting a significant reduction in what was considered wasteful spending by the government. - **High Costs for Common Items:** There were instances where government spending included $1,280 per paper cup on Air Force One and $5,800 for each TV screen in state contracts, indicating extreme overpricing or mismanagement of funds. - **Unused Office Spaces:** DOGE identified $1.6 million spent on maintaining empty office spaces, highlighting a lack of oversight in property management. - **Inefficient Spending on Programs:** Examples include funding for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) projects amounting to over $1 billion, and spending on items like sushi in the White House ($600 million) and Starbucks cups at the IRS (approximately $230,000 per month), which were cited as unnecessary expenditures. - **Fraudulent or Questionable Payments:** There have been mentions of taxpayer money being allocated for condoms in the Middle East and $50 million that was about to be spent on condoms for Gaza, which raised questions about the appropriateness and oversight of such expenditures. These examples illustrate the types of inefficiencies and potential fraud that DOGE has aimed to address. However, it's important to critically evaluate these findings: - **Source Bias:** Many of these claims come from sources that might have political biases, especially considering the involvement of high-profile figures like Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy in DOGE. The sensational nature of some of these reports can also skew public perception. - **Legal and Constitutional Concerns:** Actions taken by DOGE, such as the closure of USAID or stopping payments, have been criticized for potentially overstepping legal or constitutional bounds without Congressional approval. - **Context and Verification:** While some of the spending might seem wasteful at first glance, without detailed context or verification, it's challenging to conclude definitively on the nature of these expenditures (e.g., specific contracts might have included other services bundled with the seemingly overpriced items). - **Effectiveness and Impact:** The actual impact of these findings on government efficiency and budget reduction needs to be measured against the backdrop of overall federal spending and whether these cuts directly contribute to reducing the deficit or merely offer symbolic savings. In summary, while DOGE has brought attention to specific instances of what it deems as waste and fraud, a balanced perspective requires considering the broader implications, legal frameworks, and the necessity for independent verification of these claims.
1
0
0
@samstein Even with the deep state and Democrats trying to throw every lawsuit possible, Doge will still save hundreds of billions, if not Trillions 🇺🇸
0
0
2
@kaitlancollins I’m guessing Trump wants to track those missing billions down before negotiating concessions 🇺🇸
0
0
0