![Kasimir Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1543386652818677760/vjDIY0eg_x96.jpg)
Kasimir
@FreeKasimir
Followers
1K
Following
31K
Statuses
6K
Free People Trading | Orthodox Libertarian | Nuclear Energy | Hoppe & Block Appreciator | Austrian Economics | Approach Moral Reality and Искусство
Joined July 2022
@michaelmalice Are you implying that Journalism never had a classic respectable meaning, that this is a pseudohistorical myth? Should the good ones just be called investigative reporters?
0
0
0
@elonmusk People need to understand that when we call them Slaver Parasites that is not a dehumanizing hyperbole, but a conservative and accurate description. They produce nothing and exploit the productive society for sustenance.
0
0
0
@5BlackSquares I already defeated it by my first reply. You just didn't understand. You are the one who is not thinking. Accusing me of "missing the point" is rich when I'm responding to an ambiguous one-liner. Fuck right off.
1
0
0
@5BlackSquares @liquid2ulu "Reality exists and I can observe it" "Reality exists and I can't observe it" Do you really not see the difference between those two statements? "Validating observations implies constructing an argument." I'm not squirming around, I'm demonstrating your fallacious reasoning.
1
0
2
@5BlackSquares You state it as if it's a problem. That's the design. Jungle law advocates admit lawlessness. NAP advocates already accept the truth. Mixed law is the one to refute.
1
0
1
@5BlackSquares @liquid2ulu The word "ascertained" is not the same as the word "reality is". While Hoppe dismissed "private knowledge" as irrelevant for the topic, he never claims it does not exist. That is compatible with Objectivism. One must posit at least a hypothetical argumentation to validate.
1
0
2
@liquid2ulu @5BlackSquares He can't distinguish between the concept and some particular implementation. Same as the people who say "...but who will enforce the truth?!" In his mind there are no philosophical tools of understanding and truth-seeking, but only prescriptions for particular human actions.
1
0
1
@burnthalies @NoahFredericks He is not actually flipping the lever, and his intent is not aggressive. You're misreading the claim and have a flawed definition of aggression.
1
0
1
@Joe_Roberts01 Piers Morgan should not have dodged his question. "Why you don't accept us (Palestinian Arabs) as equal human beings?" Piers should have answered: I accept you as human beings that behave like feral beasts, like predators. Rights require reciprocity, and you get what you offer.
0
0
0
@mvonmises @MonarchoHoppean @LudwigNverMises He believes that Palestinian Arabs in Gaza are Libertarians that accept the Non-Aggression Principle and believe in Private Ownership. He further believes that their eviction would be selected based on Ethnicity, and not based on individual acts of aggression (criminal intent).
0
0
1
@LPNational @StevenNekhaila Why are you appealing to "international law"? You should only appeal to Libertarian Law, as a Radical. Where is your analysis from core principles on what "ownership" means?
1
0
2
@GOP_RAC I wonder if has anything to do with DOGE and Elon Musk targeting all the DNC-asset money-laundering NGO funding that was covered up by USAID.
0
1
3
Did Joshua Reed Eakle lose his "NGO" funding this week? 🤔 Elon Musk is the type of "virus" that physically removes the slaver parasites from their hosts, so to speak.🚁🤸
DOGE is a virus that’s actively and maliciously spreading through the Federal Government. It’s a weapon to allow Elon Musk to take over the basic mechanisms of government and bring them under his power. There’s a constitutional crisis happening now, and your action is needed. Here’s what’s happening, how we got here, and what you can do to fight back 🧵
0
2
20
@DrBose11 The Boer settled in South Africa peacefully about 120 years before their first major conflict with the Bantu tribes. In that conflict, the Boer represented farming homesteads, while the Bantu herded cattle. On Libertarian terms, the Boer are the more likely justified defenders.
2
0
1
@FabianLiberty She is too fragile for comedy. She tries to grasp power directly, a fantasy. Good comedians understand the power comes from letting go and not caring.
1
0
3
@DrBose11 @Knorssman I don't know, but it should be. I think what happens right now is more of a threat for negotiations: but it is a realistic one, and if were to be implemented, that could be one form.
1
0
0