Forthcoming in @FordhamLRev: "Of Labor, Antitrust and Why the Proposed House Settlement Will Not Solve the NCAA's Problem." Co-authored with @profmikecarrier, which is always a pleasure. https://t.co/YT98E2Kmwz

Check out the newest issue at https://t.co/0DlqJ3tH3j!

SAVE THE DATE: FRIDAY NOV. 1, @FordhamLRev full-day symposium on Reforming College Sports. I am co-hosting this event, and we have a great group of speakers. Sign up at this link to attend live or listen online. #SportsLaw https://t.co/2VmSgpVADJ

Matthew Roomberg’s note, cited by the CFPB, explores how "The ability to transfer and otherwise convert gaming assets to fiat currency or crypto-assets has led to a proliferation f money laundering.” His @FordhamLRev note was supervised by @CoxLaw, so congrats to them both! 2/2

There must be about 1200 reasons why I’m in awe of our students @FordhamLawNYC . Here’s just one: The CFPB recently cited Matthew Roomberg ‘23’s @FordhamLRev note in its report on  Banking in video games and virtual worlds. 1/2

Seema Saifee recently translated her FLR article, "Decarceration's Inside Partners," into a short essay in Slate! Check it out here:

There's still one week left to submit Symposia submissions for the 2023/2024 academic year! Proposals should be sent to symposialr@fordham.edu.

Our own @Ahilan_TooLong will interview @SecretaryMayorkas (!!) on various pressing immigration issues for the keynote event at @FordhamLRev conference on Immigrant Representation. The event honors the late Judge Katzmann. Register to join us here: https://t.co/sjkpdjYuab 1/4

The Fordham Law Review is still accepting Symposia submissions for the 2023/2024 academic year up through March 10th! Proposals should be sent to symposialr@fordham.edu. Guidelines for full proposals can be found at

Fordham Law Review Online is still accepting submissions through February, now through Scholastica as well as email! Please submit manuscripts between 3,000 and 9,000 words to eoe@fordham.edu or through Scholastica.

We are proud to announce the Volume 92 Board of Editors and Associate Editors! We are so excited to see what Volume 92 accomplishes.

The Fordham Law Review Online is now open for submissions for our spring publication cycle! Please submit pieces between 3,000 and 9,000 words to eoe@fordham.edu.

In her Note, Jordan Phelan examines the circuit split regarding nominative fair use of trademarks in the context of the resale of luxury goods and argues a uniform evaluation is needed to limit overreach by luxury brands and to allow the luxury resale market to prosper. 13/13

Chelsea Lim's Note seeks to resolve the decades-long question of whether the first sale doctrine should apply to digital transfers with the rise of blockchain and NFTs. 12/13

Kevin Green's Note argues that courts should enforce the provisions prohibiting wage garnishment in the Consumer Credit Protection Act, in the context of wages deposited into a bank account. 11/13

Xinni Cai's Note examines how New York state courts evaluate an agency’s certification that it performed a diligent search in response to a records request under New York’s FOIL and argues that the current standard favors the agency over the requestor. 10/13

There are increasing calls to integrate public participation into the development of algorithmic decision-making systems. Michele E. Gilman's Article argues we should examine existing mandates in determining how to include perspectives of marginalized stakeholders. 9/13

Camilla Hrdy's Article focuses on the “independent economic value” statutory requirement, advocating for a more stringent reading of the term. The article develops a “typology” of value failures, defining when a trade secret falls short of independent economic value. 8/13

Samir Parikh's Essay discusses shortfalls of current resolution structures for addressing the novel challenges posed by modern mass torts, ultimately providing a normative construct focused on tackling anticommons dynamics through statutory amendments to the Bankruptcy Code. 7/13

@AdamLevitin’s Essay, The Constitutional Problem of Nondebtor Releases in Bankruptcy, argues that all nonconsensual nondebtor releases in bankruptcy are unconstitutional, challenging a common feature of big-case Chapter 11 bankruptcy practice. 6/13