𝙹𝚎𝚜𝚞𝚜' 𝙺𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚍𝚘𝚖 𝚒𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍.

The headings and postscript notes are not part of the inspired text of Scripture. These were added by translators and scholars based on historical tradition and early church beliefs. The actual text of the KJV does not state that Paul wrote Hebrews, it simply presents the book as is, without an explicit author. Many early Christians believed Paul wrote it, which is why some editions include that note, but that’s not a “major error” in the translation itself. What’s important is that the actual content of Hebrews remains unchanged and perfectly preserved. The same cannot be said for modern versions like the NIV and ESV, which alter or remove words from the biblical text itself. If someone is looking for errors, they should focus on versions that tamper with Scripture, not historical notes added by men.

@syntax2600 it’s a secret 😎

@mahai217 Good! That’s how I went down the rabbit hole. Don’t become so complacent that you stop searching for the truth. I encourage you to dig deeper on this topic.

Yes, there are different editions of the KJV, but they aren’t different versions in the way modern translations are. The editions mainly involve spelling updates and minor corrections, not doctrinal or textual changes like you see in the NIV, ESV, or other modern translations that rely on different manuscripts. Maybe you should do further research on this topic on your own time, as you know so little about it.

If preservation only meant keeping the general gospel message intact, then God’s promise wouldn’t be much different from how history is preserved, it would allow for errors, omissions, and human alteration. But Jesus said in Matthew 4:4, “Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.” That means every word matters, not just the general ideas.

@Paul00540712 @eri89494 Before today, neither had i

@Paul00540712 I ordered the book, get it tomorrow 😁

@Paul00540712 @eri89494 I was watching him earlier. I like his energy

@CXMANXC @Autumn__Fox @Fiend_Support Jesus is a Jew King. Cope

𝙱𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚢 𝚕𝚘𝚟𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚗𝚎𝚜𝚜 𝚒𝚜 𝚋𝚎𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚗 𝚕𝚒𝚏𝚎, 𝚖𝚢 𝚕𝚒𝚙𝚜 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚕𝚕 𝚙𝚛𝚊𝚒𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚎 (𝙿𝚜𝚊𝚕𝚖 𝟼𝟹:𝟹)

@ApostolicEchoes And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God. (Gal 6:16)

If only the original Hebrew and Greek were perfect, then God’s Word was lost the moment the ink dried. But He promised to preserve His words, not just inspire them (Psalm 12:6-7, Matthew 24:35). If preservation failed, then we have no perfect Bible today, yet Jesus said His words would not pass away. I believe the Bible.

@Truth_matters20 Right; but back to scripture - God said his word is preserved, and I believe it.

The KJV’s rendering of Deuteronomy 32:8 aligns with God’s consistent focus on Israel as His chosen people (Deut. 7:6, Amos 3:2). Saying “sons of God” (as in the DSS/ESV) instead of “children of Israel” changes the theological framework, introducing the idea that God assigned nations to angelic beings rather than structuring them with Israel in view. But God didn’t need lesser elohim to manage nations. He set Israel apart as His own inheritance (Deut. 32:9). If His Word was lost for nearly 2,000 years, then preservation failed, yet Jesus said, “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away” (Matt. 24:35). God’s Word isn’t fallible, and He didn’t wait for modern scholars to uncover it in a cave. He preserved it, and the KJV stands as a testament to that preservation. Thanks for always keeping me on my toes, Jerry!! 🤍

@Leondero Context

@NolteTX Modern Bible translations has confused many Christians.