Brown" isn't a race, but only idiots would think otherwise, fueled by their own prejudice and ignorance. Not everyone's trapped in Poland, but those who are have clearly failed at the immigration battle, showcasing themselves as an unworthy, xenophobic bunch. They're so scared of losing their country to anyone they simplistically label as "brown" or too damn lazy to educate themselves about other cultures. You're a testament to failure, proving you're not just unwelcoming but also unworthy of the diverse world we live in.

The image you provided is a page from a book discussing the history of the Moslem conquest of India, specifically focusing on the period of Mahmud of Ghazni and the Sultanate of Delhi. The conquest is described as a "discouraging tale" and one of the bloodiest stories in history, emphasizing the precarious nature of civilization where order and liberty can be easily disrupted by invaders or internal conflicts. Given the context of the image, which discusses the historical narrative of the Moslem conquest of India, here's a more detailed exploration; The section titled "VI. THE MOSLEM CONQUEST" delves into several aspects of this historical period. Mahmud of Ghazni, a ruler from the Ghaznavid dynasty, is known for his numerous invasions into the Indian subcontinent starting from the late 10th century, weakening local Indian states through plunder and conquest. Following this, the establishment of the Delhi Sultanate in the early 13th century by the Mamluk dynasty marked the beginning of Muslim rule in India, introducing a blend of cultural exchanges and often brutal policies as invaders sought to establish dominance. The narrative suggests a lesson on civilization's fragility, highlighting how internal divisions among Hindu kingdoms, influenced by the peaceful doctrines of Buddhism and Jainism, left them unprepared for defense. These religions, while spiritually enriching, did not encourage the martial ethos needed for resistance, leading to the exploitation of this vulnerability by better-organized invaders, resulting in the loss of autonomy, wealth, and cultural heritage for the Hindu society.

The statistic presented in the image from " suggesting that "Islamic Terrorists Have Carried Out More Than 46,520 Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11" lacks critical context and can be misleading. Firstly, the source itself is known for its biased perspective, which might affect the inclusivity and accuracy of the data. Secondly, this number does not account for the global scale of terrorism, which includes attacks by various groups with different ideological backgrounds, not just those labeled as Islamic. For instance, terrorism in regions like Latin America, Europe, and Africa often involves different motives and perpetrators. Moreover, focusing solely on the quantity of attacks without considering the scale, impact, or the socio-political context behind each event paints an incomplete picture.

The information presented in the image is highly controversial and appears to be based on a significant misinterpretation or exaggeration of historical events. The figures provided, such as "over 669+ million non-Muslims" killed since 622 AD, are not supported by credible historical records or scholarly consensus. The source, "ExternalSource," is not recognized or reputable for historical data, and reliable analysis should come from peer-reviewed academic journals, established historians, and recognized institutions. The image simplifies complex historical events into a narrative suggesting a deliberate and systematic genocide over centuries, which is not how historians view the spread of Islam or the conflicts involving Muslim empires. Many conflicts throughout history have had religious, political, economic, and territorial dimensions, not solely religious ones. Additionally, the claim that "Islam has killed more than 5 times the number of people killed by communism" is a gross oversimplification and misrepresentation of religious teachings, which encompass a broad range of interpretations. Lastly, applying the term "genocide" broadly over centuries and across different contexts does not align with its legal and historical definition.

@jitegaindia @Ofer_binshtok The teachings of your Abrahamic Jewish texts, which have evolved into the Islam, are harsh and outdated. Denouncing Islam is essential for embracing cultural diversity, upholding our legal systems, and distancing from extremist elements.

The facts mentioned in the post are not accurate as they oversimplify and misrepresent the complex history of human migration, culture, and technological advancement. The claim that 95% of inventions come from these groups is unsupported by historical evidence, which shows innovation globally. Furthermore, the assertion that these groups share an equal responsibility for maintaining national integrity ignores the diversity of political systems and cultural identities within these regions. Mythos's portrayal of a singular, superior cultural mythology for Northwestern European Whites is not only historically inaccurate but also delusional, as it promotes a racially biased narrative that ignores the contributions and cultural richness of other peoples worldwide.

@ANewMythology @OrthodoxSchxlar @zerodelta144 @BrightInsight6 Stop desecrating the swastika with your pathetic, twisted fantasies, you absolute moron. Go back to kissing the cross, you brainless sheep. Fucking fake ass Aryan.

@OrthodoxSchxlar @BrightInsight6 It's crucial to stop misusing the swastika and recognize your ideology as a fantasy. Use the cross to express your pride.

@elonmusk Demand that Trump invoke the Insurrection Act; you've exposed enough betrayal and treason.

@elonmusk It's astonishing to see how voraciously the DEI parasites were draining the lifeblood from the government!

The group in Australia, often highlighted in media for their vocal protests, are not specifically targeting Islamic immigration. Unlike in the UK. These groups might include or be perceived as hate groups, potentially using immigration as a cover for xenophobic or discriminatory sentiments.

@JohnStossel @JMilei @elonmusk @DOGE Those uneducated MAGA supporters were calling Vivek a snake oil salesman, lol.

Celebrities like Snoop have engaged in what can be seen as manipulative tactics to sway Democrat opinions, with actions that border on the criminal or are at least highly controversial, especially when it comes to influencing perceptions of political figures like the President. The contradictions observed often lead people to question the influence of celebrities on serious political matters. In the current climate of 2025, there exists a dedicated group of Democrat individuals who staunchly adhere to the narrative Snoop Dogg was attempting to portray. This group, often seen on social media platforms like X, has rallied around Snoop's actions, interpreting his moves as a bold statement against the establishment or as a critique of specific political figures. These Democrat followers are not just passive consumers of this type of content; they actively engage, share, and amplify his messages, creating a subculture that celebrates this narrative, sometimes even overlooking the potential controversies or the manipulative tactics that might be involved. This phenomenon showcases how celebrity influence can shape or solidify public opinion, creating echo chambers where only one side of the story is heard and reinforced. The top three groups that voted for Harris in the 2024 U.S. presidential election were: Jewish voters: Approximately 79% Black voters: Approximately 81-86% Transgender voters(Profound psychiatric cases): Approximately 86%

@ANewMythology @NickFreiling Maybe, for some people who engage in role-playing and fantasy using appropriated symbols.

This act, though shocking and gruesome, conveys the profound despair or oppression felt by the individual, typically when other protest methods appear ineffective. It poses ethical dilemmas regarding the sanctity of human life against the urgency of the message, with public reactions varying from empathy and backing to skepticism about its efficacy or perceived pointlessness, as reflected in the diverse reactions throughout history.

@David00400610 @WhiteHouse

@NxtDoorGuy @RoofTopKrn Even if Vivek had made this statement, it might have had an impact, but not even that happened...

The practice of Sati was indeed a part of Hindu history, but it's crucial to understand that it was abolished in 1829 and is now considered illegal and obsolete. The practice of Sati, where widows would burn themselves on their husband's funeral pyre, is complex and multifaceted. While it's easy to view it solely through the lens of coercion or societal pressure, some historical accounts and narratives suggest that in certain cases, women might have chosen to perform Sati as an act of bravery or devotion. Therefore, while bravery might have been a personal motivation for some, the broader context of societal expectation and lack of alternatives cannot be overlooked. Just as with any historical practice, we should concentrate on learning from history rather than fostering animosity. Let's engage in discussions that promote understanding and respect for each other's backgrounds, rather than perpetuating stereotypes or historical inaccuracies.

@FedUpFoSho @Gore_Centr If not trains, another will claim; Human loss is inevitable., Where only the strongest shall survive.

@manthonyk76 @Gore_Centr If not trains, then something else will claim its due; Casualties among mankind are as certain as the dawn, In this world, only the fittest shall endure.