EarningsThe Profile Banner
PaulC Profile
PaulC

@EarningsThe

Followers
2K
Following
13K
Statuses
21K

Premium+ Trader & Investor 🌍📈 Commodities: Oil, Gold🏢 HK Stocks: BYD, Alibaba✍️ Medium Author: 100+ articles📚 Books on Trading, Investing & Poker

Around The Sun
Joined October 2019
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@EarningsThe
PaulC
2 months
Buy Struggling to Sell Your Writing? Boost Your Skills with These Proven Techniques on @Gumroad
1
1
22
@EarningsThe
PaulC
8 hours
@elonmusk And the Trillion in tax breaks that billionaires and huge companies get per year is still not being talked about. Funny that.
0
0
0
@EarningsThe
PaulC
11 hours
@RGuy999 @wideawake_media Dragons! They must put out a lot of CO2 not to mention methane and other gases.
0
1
1
@EarningsThe
PaulC
11 hours
@8unch0fnumb3rs @KaMillYon1 @MarioNawfal Like a cake, part lie, part truth and people will just swallow the whole thing.
1
0
0
@EarningsThe
PaulC
11 hours
@Mike_Hawg @RojoOVerdePadre @LANDAOLLC @MarioNawfal But it isn't telling the "Truth" Because there's nothing proven, so it's opinion and conjecture. Not news.
1
0
0
@EarningsThe
PaulC
11 hours
@UKempenaer @KaMillYon1 @MarioNawfal I am not defending it. I am saying there's zero evidence apart from opinion from a rather untruthful account that posts a lost of misinformation disguised as BREAKING NEWS
1
0
0
@EarningsThe
PaulC
11 hours
@SubxNews @justplainjane4 @MarioNawfal You are the media now What a joke. Zero evidence, zero research just what he read on X LMAO
2
0
0
@EarningsThe
PaulC
13 hours
@8unch0fnumb3rs @KaMillYon1 @MarioNawfal "You are the media now" Sure, if you say so. But the old media really didn't just make everything up, they SOMETIMES did some actual research.
1
0
0
@EarningsThe
PaulC
13 hours
@8unch0fnumb3rs @KaMillYon1 @MarioNawfal Who knows what the media are involved in. It's always had a bit too much influence. If this turns out to be true then maybe in the future it won't but I doubt it either way.
1
0
0
@EarningsThe
PaulC
13 hours
@justplainjane4 @SubxNews @MarioNawfal No, that's not common sense. That's called guilt by association. It happened before so it must be happening now. Zero evidence, no sources given. Just a statement.
1
0
0
@EarningsThe
PaulC
13 hours
@8unch0fnumb3rs @KaMillYon1 @MarioNawfal I think they'd explain it away as something like "National Defense" That about covers everything that a country does that wouldn't sit well with its citizens.
1
0
0
@EarningsThe
PaulC
13 hours
@seswope @MarioNawfal Can cyber defense detect hackers if they are physically working in the government offices or are spouses with access to govt computers?
0
0
0
@EarningsThe
PaulC
13 hours
@dinklemann @DeeDK1 @MarioNawfal The investigation will find nothing because the reason for the payments will be hidden on both ends, if there is any wrong doing and if not it will find nothing, too. A receipt with something strange written on it isn't evidence. Which BTW is my whole point.
0
0
0
@EarningsThe
PaulC
13 hours
@KaMillYon1 @MarioNawfal Because the government controls the media. It always has. Did you think that freedom of press was actually a reality?
2
0
1
@EarningsThe
PaulC
15 hours
@thelerdgawd @paradigm_buster @MarioNawfal I actually said this is purely speculation.
0
0
0
@EarningsThe
PaulC
15 hours
@Benchz123 @McNig76 @DiscussingFilm Indeed but the statement he made was about what? Which makes him an idiot, or at least ignorant.
0
0
0
@EarningsThe
PaulC
15 hours
@WatcherGuru From 2018
0
0
0
@EarningsThe
PaulC
15 hours
@Rtonkins74 @MarioNawfal But if he has no sources then it isn't actually fucking journalism as you put it. BLOCKED
0
0
0
@EarningsThe
PaulC
15 hours
In my old company we had cybersecurity defense against social engineering attacks. Guessing they had the same problems with cybersecurity as everyone else. And if that was coming from outside the US, maybe the govt would help pay for it? (This is purely speculation)
2
0
0
@EarningsThe
PaulC
15 hours
@SubxNews @MarioNawfal That's not about this story that's about something else. Maybe related if you kind of take a leap over things but that's not a source.
1
0
2