![Dφlphe Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1878603228927127553/SU7p1eWs_x96.jpg)
Dφlphe
@DolphogenZ
Followers
95
Following
716
Statuses
690
27, para friendly. Radqueer/Omni/Dragonkin DMs open if you wanna talk. AMA on Tellonym.
ΘΔφζ
Joined December 2024
RT @Lazzy_Lazaurus_: Start the year out right and show pride my Zoos! Let the world know you aren't afraid to love animals the same way the…
0
9
0
@FeralTheUnspeak @Xyloburn Me, before i get my money: ,,oh heck yeah, im gonna buy this, and im gonna buy that, and I'm getting this.. " Me, a day after i get my money: ,,oh heck yeah, im gonna buy this, and im... almost broke again, damn it, i gotta eat."
0
0
1
I think the big problem is, that a lot of people calling themselves "Feminists" are actually "Misandrists" One is a good thing. The other one makes one no better than the very Misogynists, feminism is standing up against. Please stop hate in general.
0
0
0
#ZooPride "eww gross" "look animal abuse" Shut up and inform yourself, idgaf abt your uninformed bias. If you see ACTUAL animal abuse, you can easily report it.
It's so gross that this site just straight up allows zoophilia to be posted. Like there's accounts with over 10k followers that post animal abuse and the site does NOTHING??? It's so beyond vile.
0
0
1
@TheRencake @shiikuumii Fair. And to give you credit, i actually didn't expect you to read it and just start repeating the same questions over and over again like so many others. Thanks for your time, i guess.
0
0
1
I can come up with several answers, I'm honestly just tired of writing the same stuff all the time. Zoophilia, is, like every sexuality, an attraction. Attractions itself are something someone has, they don't choose them, they don't have a say in how they feel, they just feel that way. And if we go further, and come to what you're arguing, consent, by law, yes, animals can't consent, by how we define sexual consent today, no, they can't. In the sense of the word however they can. Because it just means being able to agree to something. Animals all have their own body language, which, you, can actually learn to understand. This is very nuanced, but factually, you are able to determine if they'd be "in the mood" or not. They can also give clear signs of "non-consent" and dissaproval. Back to the attraction. Because being attracted to something, as you can hopefully relate if you ever had a crush, makes you care about someone. If you care about someone, you want them to be well. Therefore, a person truly attracted to an Animal would, or at least should, take into account possible harm. There are possible ways to be intimate with an animal that don't cause harm, or could harm, but it can be prevented with safety measures, like with humans. Now i ask you: If a person, a zoophile, is attracted to an animal, and takes into account all of the above, doesn't harm an animal, doesn't traumatize an animal, or does anything harmful to one, how is zoophilia bad? Because most care. It's usually just a single "zoophile/zoosadist" that goes viral for people to accuse all zoos of these things. That's literally the same as getting your bag snatched by, idk, a bulgarian and saying all bulgarians snatch bags. Or a Straight guy commiting SA and ppl saying "all straight men are r4pists" Attractions ain't actions. We don't abuse, we care.
1
0
1
RT @Z_Liefdesmorgen: Our numbers are small and our revolutionary ideals are despised. We should hold each other tightly.
0
4
0
RT @pluraphilia: @zoomadist I'm genuinely so tired of this specific discourse from ZETAs holy shit. IDGAF man I'll literally call myself a…
0
1
0