![debbiesparkles Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1872820430202875904/xaAS_0cm_x96.jpg)
debbiesparkles
@Debb227timi
Followers
19
Following
6K
Statuses
185
I don't want you to know who I am.
Joined December 2024
@Liz_Cheney @JDVance Sorry, Lizzie, you can't gaslight anyone anymore. You don't get to say you're not guilty just because you got a preemptive pardon. You might want to sit this one out.
0
0
0
@LDonivan @BrettMmurphy If you won't take his word for it than who do you think is going to know? We're done. I have work to do.
0
0
0
To be clear, what the @DOGE team and @USTreasury have jointly agreed makes sense is the following: - Require that all outgoing government payments have a payment categorization code, which is necessary in order to pass financial audits. This is frequently left blank, making audits almost impossible. - All payments must also include a rationale for the payment in the comment field, which is currently left blank. Importantly, we are not yet applying ANY judgment to this rationale, but simply requiring that SOME attempt be made to explain the payment more than NOTHING! - The DO-NOT-PAY list of entities known to be fraudulent or people who are dead or are probable fronts for terrorist organizations or do not match Congressional appropriations must actually be implemented and not ignored. Also, it can currently take up to a year to get on this list, which is far too long. This list should be updated at least weekly, if not daily. The above super obvious and necessary changes are being implemented by existing, long-time career government employees, not anyone from @DOGE. It is ridiculous that these changes didn’t exist already! Yesterday, I was told that there are currently over $100B/year of entitlements payments to individuals with no SSN or even a temporary ID number. If accurate, this is extremely suspicious. When I asked if anyone at Treasury had a rough guess for what percentage of that number is unequivocal and obvious fraud, the consensus in the room was about half, so $50B/year or $1B/week!! This is utterly insane and must be addressed immediately.
1
0
0
@LDonivan @BrettMmurphy Who's firing people? Is that the POTUS? He is the CEO. Elon and his team haven't fired anyone. They aren't there to report anything criminal..just report what they see.
0
0
0
@dilanesper @NewOldAgenda She would be in control of any criminal decision. Any civil prosecution would have to be private.
0
0
1
@danielsgoldman @JDVance What law did the judge base his decision on? And, tell me the US Code reference or common law decision please.
0
0
0
@GOP_U @BrettMmurphy When you intentionally ignore my explanation for what I referred to as an audit. I should have said an examination. ...oh, wait! That's a synonym for audit!
1
0
0
@LDonivan @pmsolo27 @BrettMmurphy Ummm...even @BrettMmurphy posted it. Will that source work? Do you even read?
1
0
0
@norwegian76 @BrettMmurphy Okay, let's use the word 'examine' the database instead. Does that make you happy? It has nothing to do with cutting off payments.
1
0
0
@LDonivan @BrettMmurphy I know exactly what an audit is..if you had read my original post, I clarified that I meant it in the generic sense...If this is all you've got to come back at me with, stand down because you are deflecting from what I was saying.
1
0
0
@GhostofGladysK @BrettMmurphy Sure..that's it. That's why they've identified money going for social programs in Burma and other places..just to hide their own evidence. That's about the dumbest thing I've heard on X today. 🤪
0
0
0