Retired consultant psychiatrist. Supporter of Mind and Norfolk & Waveney Mind. Bank MHA Reviewer CQC. Member Norfolk & Suffolk NHS FT. Own opinions expressed.
Psychiatry's primary object is not the brain but the person living in relationships. This fundamental failure to appreciate this philosophical reality is damaging psychiatry.
The biomedical hypothesis that mental illness is due to brain disease is so fundamental to the edifice of psychiatry that the serotonin theory of depression is still believed despite contrary evidence.
Psychiatrists have promoted the serotonin theory of depression and minimised antidepressant withdrawal problems because they want patients to take their antidepressants.
Take a drug to turn off your brain is the basis of the new biomedical theory of depression to justify psychedelics. Don’t believe it. People have been misled by the serotonin theory for too long for it to be replaced by further, just different, speculation.
At staff meeting in my very first job as clinical psychologist in UK, raised issue of man who had died on ECT table day before. I still recall exact response of the psychiatrist: ‘That is none of your business and I am personally insulted by your insinuation that we killed him.’
When pointed out that man’s notes included ‘ECT contraindicated – serious heart condition’, I was evicted from meeting – physically. A colleague and I had copied that page of notes, accurately predicting that it would quickly be removed from the file.
Biomedical psychiatry has always survived on speculations.
@sameerjauhar
et al are continuing to hope it can. But that is making psychiatry more like a faith than a science.
#TheWorldNeeds
more psychiatrists to be critical of their own profession and to stop misleading people that functional mental illness is due to brain disease
Even though psychiatrists may want to justify antidepressant treatment, this does not excuse minimising problems caused by taking it. Doctors are advocates of antidepressant treatment which has led to them overlooking what should have been obvious about the risks of withdrawal.
Psychiatry must stop identifying the brain with the person. People’s experience and relationships with others are at the core of primary mental illness and cannot be identified with brain processes.
@ClinpsychLucy
How is a pharmaceutical treatment supposed to help lonely people form meaningful relationships? Agree with you, Lucy, bizarre that such questions are even asked.
Sameer Jauhar, David Nutt, Carmine Pariante & Allan Young’s
“Competing Interests” section lists “promotional and consultancy work for more than 20 different pharmaceutical companies, all with a clear stake in the high rates of prescribing continuing”
@DrLadeSmith
@BBCNews
@BBCPanorama
A lot of people are not shocked. Psychiatry has been abusing the rights of people with mental health problems for too long.
@awaisaftab
I know what you mean, Awais, but it’s more endemic than that. It’s almost ‘commonsense’ to believe that mental illness is due to chemical imbalance unless it is pointed out that it is wrong. It is a myth, I agree. But people believe myths.
It is perhaps not that surprising that doctors were slow to recognise antidepressant discontinuation reactions, as they focus on short-term fixes, they are not psychologically minded and they are too quick to peddle medication.
@JDaviesPhD
Psychopharmacologists gave up the idea of serotonin imbalance causing depression quite some time ago. It has continued in clinical practice even though it can’t be proven and most of the evidence is against it.
To be clear, I tend to agree with you that antidepressants are no better than placebo but think it is exploiting people to use antidepressants in this way.
@joannamoncrieff
The experience and relationships of patients are at the core of depression, and they cannot be identified with neuronal or molecular processes.
It is obviously attractive to believe that the phenomena of human experience can be understood in exclusively biological terms. This viewpoint seems to give some certainty, perhaps particularly in the field of madness and mental illness, which may be difficult to understand.
@JDaviesPhD
@CEP_UK
It’s not just treatments that are defended, but the whole model of mental illness being brain disease that is used to justify those treatments. Such a model is more like a faith than scientific position. To give up such a faith creates grave concern for professional viability.
@DrMcFillin
There was a time when the use of medication in child psychiatry was rare. It was even a reason why some psychiatrists went into child psychiatry to avoid getting caught up in prescribing as with adults.
We do need to be clear that the issue of whether antidepressants work has not yet been decided in a scientific sense. Questioning the effectiveness of antidepressants is still legitimate.
@apospodcast
Psychiatric patients have been oppressed, mortified, and destroyed by a mental health system that, instead of serving them in its protective role of therapeutic system, has, on the contrary, contributed to the gradual and often irreversible disintegration of their identity.
The biomedical hypothesis is so fundamental to the edifice of psychiatry that the "chemical imbalance theory of depression and schizophrenia" is still believed despite contrary evidence.
However, it is legitimate to question whether an explanation of human nature can take the same form as the laws of natural science. Human beings do not behave like machines. People should not be reduced to their brains.
@benzosarebad
@recover2renew
@justin_garson
The real problem is that psychiatry does not want to take responsibility for having promoted it or at least being complicit in allowing it to be believed.