![Cooper Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1860944580080017408/VVrsZpxa_x96.jpg)
Cooper
@CooperAsheley
Followers
43
Following
1
Statuses
607
Investor | $TSLA | $RKLB | $PLTR | Clean Energy Advocate 🌿 | Commercial Space Industry 🪐🚀 | Artificial Intelligence 🤖
Santa Monica, CA
Joined August 2023
RT @elonmusk: To be clear, I have not done any media interviews and this is not actually my checklist. I am trying to make life multiplan…
0
16K
0
Please answer me a few questions. 1. Do tariffs increase or decrease the everyday burden on ordinary people's lives? If they increase it, how do they benefit 99% of Americans? 2. We impose such harsh and terrifying sanctions even on our allies. Isn't this forcing other countries to choose between America and China? Our allies and alliances are facing unprecedented impacts, aren't they?
0
0
0
Since this year marks a significant showcase for AI applications in the market, I believe Google's AI applications, like NotebookLLM, are far ahead. Whether they will be fully productized is yet to be seen, but once they are, from a pricing perspective (Google offers a document with up to 500,000 words for free, can directly read YouTube, web pages, while other AI services offer fewer document types, charge more, and don't allow internet access), it's sure to disrupt many competitors. Moreover, Google uses its own evolved model, Gemini, not relying on any third party. Currently, most other companies are either fine-tuning or directly using APIs from OpenAI, Claude, or Llama. I think now is a good time to buy some Google stock - the more it drops, the more you should buy. Wait for the earnings report.
0
0
0
I don't understand why DeepSeek would cause AI to collapse; being farther from China actually becomes a disadvantage for them. Indeed, less computing power can reshuffle the current AI logic. For instance, many companies are now in a GPU arms race, so the valuation methods based on GPU stockpiles and computational power centers need to be recalculated. Therefore, there should be a reshuffling in these couple of days. However, DeepSeek can only optimize on the shoulders of giants. Without OpenAI, there would be no DeepSeek's achievements. If OpenAI stops, DeepSeek won't evolve any further. Essentially, it's the same narrative China has had for years: low cost + late mover advantage. Not doing the initial R&D (from 0 to 1), but excelling in the subsequent stages (from 1 to 100). High-speed rail, electric vehicles, 4G, 5G, all follow this pattern.
0
0
0
I haven't deeply used DeepSeek, so I'm not sure if this LLM is superior or revolutionary. However, it's clear that OpenAI feels immense pressure, releasing multiple features that were originally for Pro users one after another. I think it's great. AI should belong to all humanity; not every user can afford $200 a month. This actually indirectly filters out "the poor," whereas AI should precisely be about reducing the burden of information access and lowering the difficulty of knowledge acquisition. These are things the wealthy don't lack, including the $200.
0
0
0
Elon Musk doesn't need to be so hung up on OpenAI's situation anymore; it's in the past. He should focus more on xAI now. I recently resubscribed to ChatGPT because Grok is free for many users, but the quality of its responses is concerning. Previously, Grok required payment and offered real-time online search capabilities compared to ChatGPT. However, after continuous comparison, I've reduced my use of Grok, except when analyzing X posts.
1
0
0
If you've read Elon Musk's biography, you'd know he grew up in South Africa, a place that believes in survival of the fittest, the law of the jungle. He won't respect your flattery or kindness; he only acknowledges strength. Additionally, he always tries to destroy those who don't listen to him, even at the cost of damaging himself.
0
0
0