Comrade Caj 📕🇵🇸
@ComradeCaj
Followers
152
Following
2K
Statuses
2K
Marxist-Leninist-Maoist / Current Re-Read: Materialism & Empirio-criticism
Joined April 2021
Sorry dawg, if your out here defending Fujimori to “own the Gonzaloites,” You’re a fascist sympathizer and not a communist.
0
0
4
Stop eating at mKKKDonaldSS. Stop eating at Burger KKKing. Don’t buy from SStarbuKKKSS
0
0
0
A week ago I was shitting on polemics. Now here I am, up at 1 am, writing a long ass polemic lmfaoooo
0
0
0
They have analyzed the concrete conditions of their society and have effectively and that’s why they are engaging in people’s war in the country side and leading mass movements within the urban areas. It seems there’s a misunderstanding of what a protracted people’s war is. The peasantry doesn’t “lead.” The peasant movement, which has had a long history of rebellions due to the intense contradictions of feudalism, is the result of conditions being ripe for armed struggle. This is why I say it’s important to analyze the objective conditions. Marxism is the concrete analysis of the objective conditions and it’s historical. All comrades who have learned from the successes of the people’s wars have learned that objectively, the peasantry is the greatest ally of the proletariat in the semi-feudal context. It’s not just a “peasant war.” This is a distortion that many people have. The communist leadership over the peasant movement is what concretely enables the peasant movement, in which the conditions are ripe for armed struggle, under the leadership of the proletariat.
1
0
7
RT @kaubangbisay2: Today would have marked Ka Joma's 86th birthday. He served for so long as a beacon, bastion, and bulwark of the Party an…
0
128
0
I’m always willing to hear concrete criticism from comrades on former and on-going people’s war. Concrete criticism is healthy for us to understand and learn from errors of the past so we don’t make the same mistake again. Practice-Theory-Practice. But I’m gonna emphasize concrete. And I have an abundance of respect for my Hoxhaist comrades. But if ones argument is limited to, “oh the Philippines should gone the Hoxhaist rout rather MLM, now they’re gonna inevitably fall into revisionism.” Then this is respectfully not an analysis of the objective conditions comrades.
China provided support for communists in the Philippines. Sison was even trained by Chinese communists during the cultural revolution, and he met Mao himself. Now I’m gonna ask you, have you done any research of the objective situation in the Philippines? This is important if you want to us analysis to actually be based in a Marxist one. It was post-Mao China which ended support with the Philippines comrades.
0
1
6
China provided support for communists in the Philippines. Sison was even trained by Chinese communists during the cultural revolution, and he met Mao himself. Now I’m gonna ask you, have you done any research of the objective situation in the Philippines? This is important if you want to us analysis to actually be based in a Marxist one. It was post-Mao China which ended support with the Philippines comrades.
1
0
8
The communists have achieved their strategic offensive on this post lmaoooo
0
0
5
