Prof. C. K. Raju Profile
Prof. C. K. Raju

@CKRaju14

Followers
14K
Following
25
Media
1K
Statuses
2K

Honorary Professor, Indian Institute of Education, Short bio at https://t.co/79696w0H6K.

India
Joined January 2022
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
1 hour
For the definition of plagiarism by the American Mathematical Society (AMS), see pics(1,2). On that definition, Atiyah clearly plagiarised my critique of Einstein, first during his Einstein centenary lecture of 2005, and a second time in the 2006 article reporting that lecture,
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
2 days
It was after the SECOND act of plagiarism by Atiyah that I exploded. Formal mathematicians are great quibblers. So, I knew that Atiyah would quibble that his remarks during his 2005 Einstein Centenary lecture had been quoted by two other people in the 2006 article. Naturally,
Tweet media one
0
12
23
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
2 days
This course differentiates between Indian ganita and colonial axiomatic mathematics, as stated in the detailed course outline. Since axiomatic math derives from Christian crusading theology, the course will certainly engage with that important issue which no one else knows or.
@Mithrasax
Mithra
3 days
@CKRaju14 I’m interested but will this course be purely mathematical in nature or will also involve about Church/Xtianity ?.
0
13
31
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
2 days
जब पाठ्य पुस्तक आयेगी तो उसका हिंदी अनुवाद AI से करवा कर पढ़ें.
@yogi999saraswat
Yogeshwar Prakash Saraswat 😎
2 days
@CKRaju14 Sir हम लोग जोधपुर में रहते हैं तो केसे करेगे.
3
3
20
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
2 days
It was after the SECOND act of plagiarism by Atiyah that I exploded. Formal mathematicians are great quibblers. So, I knew that Atiyah would quibble that his remarks during his 2005 Einstein Centenary lecture had been quoted by two other people in the 2006 article. Naturally,
Tweet media one
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
4 days
Atiyah brazenly plagiarised AGAIN, a SECOND time, AFTER he has been directly informed of my work, AGAIN without acknowledging me or my earlier work, bcoz such acknowledgement would have gone against his aim to glorify himself by cheating, like Einstein. He knew from the
Tweet media one
0
35
70
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
3 days
You can find it in many libraries, such as Sahitya Academy, NISTADS, PMML, IIAS, IISc etc. Or go to the Pearson site or the usual pirates.
@dasjgnthscm
Jagannatha Das
3 days
@CKRaju14 Sir, could not find your book anywhere "Cultural Foundations of Mathematics: The Nature of Mathematical Proof, and the Transmission of the Calculus from India to Europe in the 16th c. CE, Pearson Longman". Where can it be bought from ?.
1
8
27
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
3 days
There will be a textbook after the course is repeated in IIT. Better to learn from a textbook than a video.
@katek10210
दिपेन
3 days
@CKRaju14 Is there any chance in future for online course of this? Paid of course. People from different parts of this country are watching your work. It may not be possible for everyone to come personally. Please do consider it.
9
13
66
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
3 days
Its an offline course. No video recording, no uploads to Youtube. Want the knowledge, join in person (if seats still left).
@sg1261__
Aarush
3 days
@CKRaju14 Upload it on YouTube.
5
7
44
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
4 days
Atiyah brazenly plagiarised AGAIN, a SECOND time, AFTER he has been directly informed of my work, AGAIN without acknowledging me or my earlier work, bcoz such acknowledgement would have gone against his aim to glorify himself by cheating, like Einstein. He knew from the
Tweet media one
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
5 days
It would have been too crude to deny the VERY CLOSE similarity, between . (1) my correction to Einstein's mistake in my books and published papers, prior to 2005 and . (2) Atiyah's Einstein lecture of 2005 (the original video was then still online; it was taken down later). In
Tweet media one
1
39
85
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
5 days
4 slots are still open for the Calculus as Ganita offline course (which is actually 12 days from 14th to 26 July). The organizers will accept applications till 7 July.
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
22 days
A 14 day offline course on Calculus as Ganita (calculus without limits and w/o real numbers), in NIE, Mysore, see poster (pic1) and brochure (pics2,3). Scan qr codes for course contents. Next iteration in Aug is for IIT students only, not open to general public.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
3
31
53
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
5 days
It would have been too crude to deny the VERY CLOSE similarity, between . (1) my correction to Einstein's mistake in my books and published papers, prior to 2005 and . (2) Atiyah's Einstein lecture of 2005 (the original video was then still online; it was taken down later). In
Tweet media one
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
6 days
Atiyah was IMMEDIATELY INFORMED of my work after his 2005 Einstein Centenary lecture was repeated in a second talk at KITP (pic1). My son doing a PhD in physics at Harvard watched the webcast and told me. Since I was travelling in Australia/Singapore with limited access to the
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
4
26
59
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
6 days
Atiyah was IMMEDIATELY INFORMED of my work after his 2005 Einstein Centenary lecture was repeated in a second talk at KITP (pic1). My son doing a PhD in physics at Harvard watched the webcast and told me. Since I was travelling in Australia/Singapore with limited access to the
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
11 days
To celebrate (🤣) Einstein's plagiarism of special relativity, Michael Atiyah, in his 2005 Einstein Centenary lecture, PLAGIRSED my idea, viz. that a proper solution of the 2-body problem (electron-proton) of classical electrodynamics might help explain various puzzling features
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
Tweet media four
3
28
77
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
7 days
My further point: selling a math technique by propagating the lie that it is from the Vedas damages the dignity and credibility of the Veda-s which are shabda pramana for Hinduism. At least give it another name (but then it might not sell as well). So what is more important?.
@NaimVas
NaimishaVasi
7 days
@moushumi2974 @CKRaju14 @Sanjay_Dixit The author is a professional mathematician and his point, if I may presume so, is that Ganita exists beyond the useful techniques for mental calculation provided as part of 'Vedic Mathematics'. It is also a fact that such a branch of Ganita never existed. Only a coined term.
3
23
89
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
7 days
A definite "use" of "Vedic math" is to enable the West to bash Indian scholarship as very careless. 😀. It is also anti-Hindu.(pic1). However, I reject S. G. Dani's critique of Vedic math, since Dani's own Bible math (spread by the French Jesuit priest Racine through TIFR math
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
@sanjaybabe76925
sanjbaba
8 days
@CKRaju14 My friends who cleared CAT exams says that they were taught vedic maths for solving higher mathematics problems which is easier too. So Ganita is been used in major way, needs to be promoted at schools.
1
43
100
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
9 days
Exactly, but elimination of infinitesimals is not a fix! . So, Leibniz, Newton and other Xtian discoverers were like students who cheat in an exam to claim false credit for what they didn't grasp. See extract from intro (pic1) to forthcoming course on calculus as ganita (pic2).
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
@Lmaonoandidj
Tiger in the woods
9 days
@CKRaju14 Doesn’t the epsilon delta definition of a limit fix most of these issues with infinitesimals? The need for infinitesimals itself is removed.
2
39
83
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
9 days
You seem a defender of false history (pic1) which chauvinistically glorifies Western knowledge thieves. Presumably you can't recover from your childhood-indoctrination. Given that the West itself resoundingly rejected Leibniz's infinitesimals (and Newton's fluxions) and
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
1
28
68
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
11 days
To celebrate (🤣) Einstein's plagiarism of special relativity, Michael Atiyah, in his 2005 Einstein Centenary lecture, PLAGIRSED my idea, viz. that a proper solution of the 2-body problem (electron-proton) of classical electrodynamics might help explain various puzzling features
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
Tweet media four
2
77
184
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
12 days
Well my retarded gravitation theory of 2012 (see expository article, pic1) certainly is a history-dependent theory of gravitation (uses retarded FDEs). It's advantage? The many-body problem can be done; it has not been done on general relativity, but It is needed because
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
1
20
72
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
13 days
Yes, it puzzled many. The gullible Hilbert was even willing to share credit, but the greedy Einstein wanted all of it. The Nobel-laureate Eugene Wigner, who was Hilbert's post-doc, was among the many ppl who found it hard to understand (pic) how Hilbert was dealt out of credit
Tweet media one
@katek10210
दिपेन
14 days
@CKRaju14 This part I don't understand. Hilbert had the equations and still gave away the credit to Einstein?. Why didn't he try to take credit for himself?.
5
40
98
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
14 days
Einstein COULD not have created special relativity, he was too ignorant. But how do you know Einstein created general relativity? From stories and the press obviously!😀. The Jewish owner of New York Times, Adolph Ochs promoted fellow Jew Einstein by running a free publicity
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
Tweet media four
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
19 days
Einstein never solved the 2-body (e.g. electron-proton) problem of classical electrodynamics—and was too weak in math even to understand Poincare’s remark that it needed a different math. Poincare died before he could get any solution to this problem, very difficult those days.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
8
88
202
@CKRaju14
Prof. C. K. Raju
15 days
I have already written textbooks such as Rajju Ganita which reject the use of invisible points. These have been tried out YEARS ago. (pic1,2). For a shadow PM you are remarkably clueless that education is tightly state controlled. Who is going to say my texts are "better"? You?
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
@ShadowPMI
Dr. Subhas Reddy C.
15 days
@CKRaju14 Why don't you write parallel maths textbooks, and show that yours are better, instead of ranting on social media for decades till you die?.
8
49
142