"Who devises the protocols of 'clarity' and whose interests do they serve? What is foreclosed by the insistence on parochial standards of transparency as requisite for all communication? What does 'transparency' keep obscure?" (Gender Trouble, XIX)
"When we consider what feminist thought might be in relation to survival, a different set of questions emerges: Whose life is counted as a life?" (Undoing Gender, 205)
"Most importantly, we see the violence done in the name of preserving western values, and we have to ask whether this violence is one of the values that we seek to defend...
"What happens when terms such as butch and femme emerge not as simple copies of heterosexual masculinity and heterosexuality femininity, but as expropriations that expose the nonnecessary status of their assumed meanings?" (Undoing Gender 209)
"If a term becomes questionable, does that mean it cannot be used any longer, and that we can only use terms that we already know how to master?" (Undoing Gender, 181)
Absolutely loving how the so-called class warriors on the hard left are praising Judith Butler to the hilt despite her being the elite of the elite top cat in pointless incomprehensible academia. Even Camille Paglia tells me she can't understand a word she's saying.
"What kind of dissonance is experienced by those who no longer have a home in one country, and do not yet have a home in a new country, but live in a suspended zone of citizenship?" (Undoing Gender, 195)
"So what if new forms of gender are possible, how does this affect the ways that we live and the concrete needs of the human community?" (Undoing Gender 219)
"Subjectively, we ask: Who can I become in such a world where the meanings and limits of the subject are set out in advance for me?" (Undoing Gender, 58)
"If gender is constructed through relations of power and, specifically, normative constraints that not only produce but also regulate various bodily beings, how might agency be derived from this notion of gender as the effect of productive constraint?" (Bodies That Matter x)
"There is the question of when 'life' begins, and then the question of when “human” life begins, when the 'human' begins; who knows, who is equipped or entitled to know, whose knowledge holds sway here, whose knowledge functions as power here?" (Undoing Gender 225)
"If Lacan presumes that female homosexuality issues from a disappointed heterosexuality, as observation is said to show, could it not be equally clear to the observer that heterosexuality issues from a disappointed homosexuality?" (Gender Trouble, 63)
"Thus, the question is no longer, How is gender constituted as and through a certain interpretation of sex? (a question that leaves the 'matter' of sex untheorized), but rather Through what regulatory norms is sex itself materialized?" (Bodies That Matter 10)
"What would it mean to exclude from the field of potential legitimation those who are outside of marriage, those who live nonmonogamously, those who live alone, those who are in whatever arrangements they are in that are not the marriage form?" (Undoing Gender, 115-116)
"If gender is not an artifice to be taken on or taken off at will and, hence, not an effect of choice, how are we to understand the constitutive and compelling status of gender norms without falling into, the trap of cultural determinism?" (Bodies That Matter x)
"And how is it that treating the materiality of sex as a given presupposes and consolidates the normative conditions of its own emergence?" (Bodies That Matter 10)
...that is, another mark of 'western-ness' that we fear might be lost if we agree to live in a more culturally complex and hybrid world?" (Undoing Gender 231)
"Insofar as it relies on this construal, the sex/gender distinction founders along parallel lines; if gender is the social significance that sex assumes within a given culture—and for the sake of argument we will let 'social' and 'cultural' stand in an uneasy interchangeability..
"But what if the very categories of the human have excluded those who should be operating within its terms, who do not accept the modes of reasoning and justifying 'validity claims' that have been proffered by western forms of rationalism?" (Undoing Gender 221)
"How could there be this ironic and inevitable distance between knowing a thing to be true and acting in accordance with that knowledge?" (Undoing Gender 239)
"Although the very existence of a taboo against incest presumes that a family structure is already there, for how else would one understand the prohibition on sexual relations with members of one’s own family without a prior conception of family?" (Undoing Gender, 157)
"Why would it be that we arrange everything so that we might, with difficulty and courage, speak our desire before another human being, and await the words they will speak in return?" (Undoing Gender, 162)
"And if I persisted in this notion that bodies were in some way constructed, perhaps I really thought that words alone had the power to craft bodies from their own linguistic substance?" (Bodies That Matter x)
"The questions are: how best to have them, how most productively to stage them, and how to act in ways that acknowledge the irreversible complexity of who we are?" (Undoing Gender, 176)
...then why shy away from the fact that there may be ways that masculinity emerges in women, and that feminine and masculine do not belong to differently sexed bodies?" (Undoing Gender, 197)
"Are we stopped in time, made more regular and coherent than we necessarily want to be, when we submit to the norms in order to achieve the entitlements one needs, and the status one desires?" (Undoing Gender, 81)
"Or is part of what it means to 'recognize' the Other to recognize that he or she comes, of necessity, with a history which does not have oneself as its center?" (Undoing Gender, 146)
"Is it, therefore, not a thing, not a fact, not a presupposition, but rather a demand for rearticulation that never quite vanishes—but also never quite appears?" (Undoing Gender, 186)