![Burr Redding Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1771747898767585281/43t-dA9s_x96.jpg)
Burr Redding
@Burr__Redding
Followers
40
Following
270
Statuses
1K
Joined December 2019
@MichaelCol43808 @causeigotIT It’s risky, although the Commonwealth didn’t even bother trying to put her previous media interviews or other public statements into evidence at the prior trial.
0
0
2
@richardvetstein I wouldn’t say “major” just yet. Need to see the particulars of the motion to dismiss first. I’m skeptical of any further bombshells.
0
0
0
@MichaelCol43808 @MamaLama43 @SleuthieGoosie I don’t think them not filing or having a copy of the preservation order is a big deal. The problem is the order itself is narrowly tailored and objectively doesn’t capture this. That’s why AJ kept going back to “self-executing” duty as a fall back argument. (It’s not gonna work)
0
0
0
@MichaelCol43808 @U_Got_Moxie @DonutsBaga 26K for an “occasional” consulting work matter is not a bad deal! And, no, to be clear: I don’t think he is doing the KR case “for the money”.
1
0
0
@kreadisinnocent @BostonDefender Her “denial” here means nothing though. The District Court order was still a valid order and was in effect for months. The question is what the parameters of that order cover. That’s where I believe she will ultimately rule against the defense.
0
0
3
@legalfreak24 @MichaelCol43808 @KYMaverick1 I wouldn’t say there is “ZERO case law”, but it’s not enough for any type of retroactive relief.
1
0
1
@AHenry39284302 @kreadisinnocent @KristinaRex Haha. I was going to say the same thing. The McAlberts troll brigade is now gonna target her probably.
0
0
5
@KYMaverick1 @OliviaLambo_ I assume you are basing this point of view entirely on your observations of the Karen Read trial, correct?
1
0
0
@LanaDelTurtle_ @DeputyManshark @KristinaRex You would think these people would have nothing to worry about when it comes to the federal investigation. At least, that’s what they have been saying!
0
0
2