Burner Account Profile
Burner Account

@BurnerA81213303

Followers
464
Following
706
Statuses
1K

progressive burner account

Joined December 2021
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@BurnerA81213303
Burner Account
3 months
Please read through
@BowlOfMice
Dumber than a Bowl full of Mice #Fella 🇺🇸🇺🇦
3 months
Bit of a long 🧵 but I promise, it is actually going somewhere, not just a rant on Trump's cabinet picks. But the rant part first: Marco Rubio (Sec of State) - More or less qualified, but has become a whipped dog, begging for his master's love, since 2016 1/15
0
1
3
@BurnerA81213303
Burner Account
5 hours
@enough_lying44 @SenTinaSmith They would have ignored court orders?
1
0
0
@BurnerA81213303
Burner Account
13 hours
RT @SenTinaSmith: They control Congress. They control the Executive. The last check on their power grab is the judicial system – and that’s…
0
89
0
@BurnerA81213303
Burner Account
13 hours
0
0
1
@BurnerA81213303
Burner Account
24 hours
@FloridaWhigs @MattKeegan28780 @krassenstein That would make him a dictator, at this point there is no possible way you could be this ignorant on how the government works so you got me you have been trolling me with bad faith arguments just to see how far you could get me to go
1
0
0
@BurnerA81213303
Burner Account
24 hours
@FloridaWhigs @MattKeegan28780 @krassenstein I never said the supreme court couldn't rule something unconstitutional
0
0
0
@BurnerA81213303
Burner Account
24 hours
@FloridaWhigs @MattKeegan28780 @krassenstein Yes that is how it works, that is why our republic has succeeded for so long, we have a clear separation of powers with checks and balances
1
0
0
@BurnerA81213303
Burner Account
24 hours
@FloridaWhigs @MattKeegan28780 @krassenstein Those laws would be overturned as unconstitutional
1
0
0
@BurnerA81213303
Burner Account
1 day
@FloridaWhigs @MattKeegan28780 @krassenstein You are wrong, you absolutely can challenge an executive order saying it violates statutory law
0
0
1
@BurnerA81213303
Burner Account
1 day
@FloridaWhigs @MattKeegan28780 @krassenstein EXECUTIVE ORDERS ARE SUBJECT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW Get that through your head, this has always been the case
1
0
0
@BurnerA81213303
Burner Account
1 day
@FloridaWhigs @MattKeegan28780 @krassenstein The Judiciary has the power, there have many many rulings that went against what a President was doing throughout history, they can appeal, what they cannot do is rule like a king
1
0
0
@BurnerA81213303
Burner Account
1 day
@ninaturner Biden should have been working on this and inflation, probably him or Harris could have won despite his horrible foreign policy
0
0
1
@BurnerA81213303
Burner Account
1 day
@Juan2424248 @MattWalshBlog This guy gets it!
0
0
0
@BurnerA81213303
Burner Account
1 day
@SocialistMMA If only that were true, most people don't care
0
0
0
@BurnerA81213303
Burner Account
1 day
@MattKeegan28780 @FloridaWhigs @krassenstein He knows he is wrong he is just trolling
1
0
0
@BurnerA81213303
Burner Account
1 day
@BallinOnABudg12 @FloridaWhigs @krassenstein Yes, I never said differently
0
0
0
@BurnerA81213303
Burner Account
1 day
@victoria_uk22 @libsoftiktok The cross of St. Peter?
0
0
2
@BurnerA81213303
Burner Account
1 day
RT @krassenstein: Pete Buttigieg understands America much better than JD Vance does...
Tweet media one
0
5K
0
@BurnerA81213303
Burner Account
1 day
@FloridaWhigs @MattKeegan28780 @krassenstein They can rule it illegal if someone challenges it, if they are wrong the decision will be overturned on appeal, this is literally how the system works
0
0
0
@BurnerA81213303
Burner Account
1 day
@FloridaWhigs @krassenstein That is not true, look at when Biden's OSHA vaccine mandate was struck down, that was on statutory grounds
1
0
0