🚨🚨 THREAD: ELON MUSK’S WEALTH IS TIED TO HIS COMPANIES – HE’S FOCUSED ON GLOBAL GOALS, NOT SHORT-TERM FIXES 🚨🚨 1/ 🧵 In response to claims that Elon Musk, with his $442.7 billion net worth, could “change America” by building homes or buying drug companies: Here’s the reality of where his wealth is and what his goals are for humanity. 2/ Musk’s net worth isn’t a mountain of cash waiting to be spent. It’s tied to the value of companies like Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink, and The Boring Company. These companies are actively working on large-scale, systemic solutions to global challenges. 3/ SpaceX: SpaceX’s mission isn’t just about launching rockets. It’s about enabling humanity to become a multiplanetary species, securing long-term survival. SpaceX has reduced spaceflight costs and plans to establish a sustainable colony on Mars. 4/ Starlink: SpaceX’s Starlink provides satellite internet to remote regions, giving millions access to the web, including disaster zones and conflict areas like Ukraine. It’s already improving lives in ways traditional infrastructure can’t. 5/ Tesla: Tesla’s mission is to accelerate the transition to sustainable energy. It’s about tackling climate change by making EVs mainstream, advancing battery storage, and scaling solar power. These are game-changers for global carbon reduction. 6/ Neuralink: Neuralink aims to revolutionize healthcare with brain-computer interfaces. Think curing paralysis, treating neurological diseases, and restoring sensory function. This is groundbreaking medical technology. 7/ The Boring Company: Focused on solving urban traffic and emissions issues, The Boring Company develops underground transit systems. By reducing gridlock, it saves time, cuts pollution, and rethinks urban mobility. 8/ Could Musk liquidate his assets to buy homes or drug companies? Sure, but selling off his shares would collapse the value of his companies and the thousands of jobs tied to them. His approach is about scaling innovation, not patching short-term fixes. 9/ Musk’s vision is systemic: building technologies that address root problems like climate change, space exploration, and healthcare. The goal is to create sustainable, scalable solutions that benefit humanity as a whole. 10/ Criticizing Musk for not solving every immediate issue ignores the profound impact his companies are already having: •EVs reducing emissions. •Starlink connecting the unconnected. •Neuralink developing life-changing medical tech. •SpaceX ensuring humanity’s long-term survival. 11/ His wealth isn’t about personal indulgence; it’s fueling high-risk, high-reward projects designed to reshape the world. You don’t have to agree with every decision, but dismissing him as a “waste” ignores the scale of his contributions. 12/ FINAL NOTE: Musk’s efforts span sustainable energy, healthcare, space colonization, and more. While he’s polarizing, his work reflects a focus on humanity’s future. Critique is fair, but let’s keep it grounded in reality. 🌍

@CoryBooker @threadreaderapp unroll

@RupertLowe10 Bring in a @DOGE

🚨 MISLEADING NARRATIVE ALERT! 🚨 THREAD: DEBUNKING THE CLAIMS ABOUT ZELENSKYY’S STATEMENT AND TRUMP’S CALL WITH PUTIN 👇🧵 1️⃣ CLAIM: 📢 “Zelenskyy won’t accept peace deals without Kyiv’s input, and he found Trump’s call with Putin ‘unpleasant.’” ❌ Misleading framing aimed at stirring controversy. ➡️ Zelenskyy’s position has always been that no deal can be made about Ukraine without Ukraine’s involvement—this isn’t breaking news or new information. ➡️ His stance aligns with international diplomatic norms—affected nations must always be part of peace negotiations. ➡️ Suggesting this is a reaction to Trump’s call is conflating unrelated events to generate unnecessary outrage. 📢 This is standard diplomacy, not a dramatic shift. 2️⃣ TRUMP’S CALL WITH PUTIN: STANDARD DIPLOMACY 🚨 Engaging with world leaders—friends and foes—is normal diplomatic practice. ➡️ Presidents routinely speak to both allies and adversaries to reduce tensions, discuss conflicts, and seek diplomatic solutions. ➡️ Trump’s call with Putin is not a scandal—it’s a standard part of leadership and international diplomacy. ➡️ No peace agreement can be imposed without Ukraine’s consent—something the U.S. and its allies consistently respect. 📢 Talking to Putin ≠ bypassing Ukraine. Diplomacy requires dialogue. 3️⃣ THE MEDIA SPIN 📰 Why does this headline feel dramatic? It’s all about spin. ➡️ The phrase “unpleasant” is being exaggerated to suggest a diplomatic rift, when in reality, leaders often make tactical comments in public for domestic audiences. ➡️ Zelenskyy’s careful choice of words is not a personal attack—it’s a diplomatic signal. ➡️ The bigger context of ongoing U.S.-Ukraine cooperation is ignored to amplify a minor soundbite. 📢 Headlines like this thrive on drama, not substance. 4️⃣ WHAT’S REALLY HAPPENING? ➡️ Ukraine remains heavily reliant on U.S. and Western support—both militarily and diplomatically. ➡️ Zelenskyy’s comments reflect his ongoing effort to maintain international support and ensure Ukraine’s voice is heard in any future negotiations. ➡️ Trump’s call with Putin could be part of broader peace-building efforts, something every leader should welcome if it helps end the conflict. 📢 Diplomatic strategy doesn’t need to be dressed up as controversy. 5️⃣ BOTTOM LINE: 🚨 Zelenskyy’s position on peace talks isn’t new—it’s standard diplomatic practice. 🚨 Trump’s call with Putin is normal diplomacy, not a scandal or slight against Ukraine. 🚨 The media’s framing inflates minor comments into unnecessary controversy. 📢 Focus on real diplomacy—not overhyped soundbites. RT for facts over media spin. 🔥

@CoryBooker @threadreaderapp unscroll

@10DowningStreet That’s looks fucking horrendous. People don’t want to live like this. It looks like Chernobyl.

@zarahsultana Bullshit. The boats come from mainland Europe. Mainland Europe the North at least is NOT unsafe!

@LBC @NickFerrariLBC We don’t want to change our culture for someone else either but we’re having to more and more every single day.

RT @SeibtNaomi: This is Farhad N. The picture perfect prime example of an Afghan refugee that the left cheers for. Today, he committed…

🚨 FEARMONGERING ALERT! 🚨 THREAD: DEBUNKING THE CLAIM THAT “AN UNELECTED BIG TECH OLIGARCHY IS ATTACKING DEMOCRACY AND EXPORTING TOXICITY TO EUROPE” 👇🧵 1️⃣ CLAIM: 📢 “What’s unfolding in the US is a wholesale attack on democracy by Big Tech oligarchs, which could spread to Europe.” ❌ Wildly misleading and alarmist. ➡️ There is no “wholesale attack” on democratic norms or rule of law. ➡️ Big Tech is not a shadow government—it’s a collection of corporations competing for market dominance, often held accountable by regulatory bodies. ➡️ Democracy in the U.S. is not collapsing, despite the hyperbole. Institutions, checks, and balances remain intact. 📢 Criticizing Big Tech ≠ democracy under attack. 2️⃣ BIG TECH ≠ UNELECTED OLIGARCHY 🚨 Let’s clarify what Big Tech actually is: ➡️ Private companies (like Meta, Apple, and Google) are not government authorities. They are subject to laws, regulations, and market forces. ➡️ Elected officials in the U.S. and Europe regularly challenge and regulate Big Tech. ➡️ The tech industry is not a monolith—it consists of competing businesses, each with differing goals and policies. 📢 Calling them an “unelected oligarchy” is sensationalism, not fact. 3️⃣ WHAT’S REALLY HAPPENING IN THE U.S.? 🇺🇸 Yes, there is debate and controversy around Big Tech’s role in free speech, data privacy, and influence—but that’s not the same as a democratic crisis. ➡️ Big Tech faces ongoing scrutiny and regulation from the U.S. government, including antitrust cases and bipartisan calls for reform. ➡️ Content moderation debates and platform policies are complex issues—not evidence of a coordinated attack on democracy. 📢 Public discourse and legal checks are signs of a functioning democracy—not its collapse. 4️⃣ TOXICITY IS NOT AN “EXPORT” 🚨 Social media’s challenges—misinformation, polarization, and content moderation—are global, not uniquely American. ➡️ European nations have already implemented stricter regulations, including the EU’s Digital Services Act and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) to rein in Big Tech. ➡️ Blaming the U.S. for “exporting toxicity” ignores Europe’s proactive approach to tech governance. 📢 Europe isn’t a passive victim—it’s a leader in regulating digital spaces. 5️⃣ WHAT SHOULD LEADERS FOCUS ON? 🔑 Collaboration, not fearmongering. ➡️ Governments should engage with Big Tech to balance innovation and regulation. ➡️ Focus on cybersecurity, data protection, and fair competition, not sensational claims of an “unelected oligarchy.” ➡️ The solution is thoughtful governance—not emotional panic. 📢 Democracy isn’t under siege—it’s adapting to a new digital age. 6️⃣ BOTTOM LINE: 🚨 Big Tech is not a shadow government or an unelected oligarchy—it’s a group of companies subject to laws and regulations. 🚨 Democracy is not collapsing, and Europe is far from helpless. 🚨 Hyperbole distracts from the real challenge: creating balanced, thoughtful tech policies. 📢 Focus on solutions, not fear-driven rhetoric. RT for facts over fear. 🔥

@NadiaWhittomeMP We’re full. How hard is that for you to understand?

@campbellclaret With your track record of war mongering we know where you stand. Finally we have a leader who is openly and honestly trying to bring about peace. It’s hard for die hard politicians to accept.

RT @RupertLowe10: The only reparations we should be discussing are those from China to compensate for their undeniable role in the release/…

RT @darrengrimes_: I do not want a single Gazan in this country. And I do not give a flying flamingo for their plight when my country risks…

@mjfree He's clever for sure but even he's not that clever!

RT @RupertLowe10: We need a ruthless review into immigration judges. Sacking any who are found to be actively working against the interest…

🚨 “HUMBLE UPBRINGING” MYTH ALERT! 🚨 THREAD: DEBUNKING KEIR STARMER’S NARRATIVE ABOUT HIS “HUMBLE UPBRINGING” AND THE REALITY OF HIS HOUSING CLAIMS 👇🧵 1️⃣ CLAIM: 📢 “Growing up we didn’t have much, but I always had a safe and secure home.” ❌ Carefully curated narrative. ➡️ Starmer’s upbringing wasn’t as tough as this implies. He often portrays himself as coming from humble beginnings, but the reality is far more middle-class. ➡️ Starmer’s father was a successful toolmaker with a private business, and his family lived in a detached house in Oxted, Surrey—one of the UK’s wealthiest counties. ➡️ He attended a grammar school and later studied at Oxford University. 📢 Starmer’s upbringing wasn’t one of hardship—it was stable, comfortable, and far from working-class struggle. 2️⃣ WHY THIS MATTERS 🚨 The issue isn’t his upbringing—it’s how he manipulates it for political gain. ➡️ Framing himself as “one of the people” is a common political tactic to build relatability, but it distorts the truth and distracts from the policies. ➡️ Many voters facing real housing insecurity or struggling to get on the property ladder won’t relate to this carefully constructed backstory. 📢 Honesty matters—don’t spin your life story to score political points. 3️⃣ THE HOUSING CRISIS: REALITY CHECK 🏠 Starmer’s narrative conveniently sidesteps the core problems. ➡️ Homeownership was far more attainable in his youth, with affordable house prices and access to stable jobs. ➡️ Today’s young people face impossible odds, with house prices skyrocketing and wages stagnating. ➡️ The secure home Starmer had is a dream out of reach for millions of renters and first-time buyers. 📢 The crisis isn’t about needing more inspirational backstories—it’s about real, bold action to fix housing affordability. 4️⃣ THE REAL CHALLENGE: 🔑 We need solutions, not personal anecdotes. ➡️ Planning reform to unlock more housing supply. ➡️ Tackling high energy and construction costs. ➡️ Regulating the rental market to protect tenants. ➡️ Clear, measurable housing targets—not vague promises. 📢 Personal stories might inspire, but policy is what changes lives. 5️⃣ BOTTOM LINE: 🚨 Starmer’s “humble upbringing” narrative doesn’t reflect the reality of his comfortable, middle-class background. 🚨 His experience of a secure home is vastly different from what millions of young people face today. 🚨 The housing crisis requires serious solutions—not nostalgic storytelling. 📢 Focus on real policy—not carefully packaged political myths. RT for facts over fiction. 🔥

@ElmosUnderpants @LBC That's bullshit and you know it.

@jonsopel It's beautiful. Don't give in to your evil. Kids are glorious.

@zarahsultana I think this is the most terrifying and disturbing post I've ever read.

@DOGE Reminds me of the X-Files! 😅