@theDarkoside @TractorLaw @GregAbbott_TX @SenBryanHughes Looks like you committed one of the three classic blunders. Never start a land war in Asia, never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line, and never quote from Schenck v. US without reading it first.

When you elect a frail, elderly man as president...

@MarcWatkinsEsq It’s a Wonderful Life Muppet Christmas Carol Lion in Winter

@alicetsl @Rainmaker1973 Plate armor when they should be in mail

@kdcreer @thefemmeinblk @SmashJT @elonmusk The case is filed in Fed Ct in New York. He'd have to rely on NY's anti-SLAPP which, while good, is not procedurally applicable in Fed Ct and the substantive sections on fee shifting are also on pretty shaky grounds. No quick way out of this.

@ClugOverlord @SmashJT @elonmusk Wikipedia is used as a context source in the preliminary statement to give a judge, who is presumably unfamiliar with GamerGate, the opportunity for a broad level overview. It's not an evidentiary citation.

@realJayDubWilly @gammongaming @Vara_Dark And the federal courts in NY have since consistently found the procedural elements of the state anti-SLAPP, early dismissal and summary judgment motions, are not applicable.

@groatswerth @SmashJT @RonColeman The current precedent in EDNY leans towards the NY anti-SLAPP being inapplicable in fed ct. The preliminary dismissal options are pretty clearly out the window and the fee recovery aspects are on very shaky ground.

@realZexzyz @wolmanj @USConstAmendXIV @loweringthebar I mean, we are talking about the law, exactitude is absolutely appropriate. Especially when the exception is explicit in the amendment.

@SquareLukester @MrMicPowers @SmashJT Well, to start with, one is a tautology.

@StratOvan1969 @SmashJT I think some of the claims are probably borderline, but should survive a motion to dismiss. The attorneys representing her are definitely competent. Former chief legal officer for Pokemon plus one of the attorneys who represented CAIR against Loomer.

@StratOvan1969 @SmashJT He also represented Laura Loomer in her attempt to sue CAIR and Twitter for "civil conspiracy" and she ended up owing them $124,000 in attorneys fees.

@StratOvan1969 @SmashJT You know Coleman has made a habit of losing defamation cases recently, right? Broughty v. Bouzy. Illoominate v. Cair. Loomer actually has a malpractice case going against him because he cost her tens of thousands in legal fees.

@michaelrentiers @itsunforgiven @SmashJT Lawyers who know their client is going to be at least a LPPF anyway and are preparing to cope with the actual malice standard. Judges aren't generally a fan of lawyers trying to hide the ball. Be up front about your case.

@ProjectRevGame @fandompulse And this "legal experience" caused you to use an LLM to write an analysis of criminality... for a civil claim?

@wolmanj Roger certainly has some very strange ideas about what constitutes a trap.

@AnthonyMKreis Very handy to just ban the only organization that can lift a declaration of martial law from meeting.

@FormerDemocrat0 @CChi4444 @ASFleischman In ira veritas.

@TruthNinja316 @ASFleischman His mother already confirmed she sent it.

@outerspacetaste @peta @SnowBallBoy777 Reactionary and aggressive is PETA's fundamental strategy. Why would they be fired?