![Gilliam Bateman Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1642218195372355585/QCaM3tya_x96.jpg)
Gilliam Bateman
@BatemanGilliam
Followers
20
Following
166
Statuses
5K
Joined October 2022
@senpainotes @lewdismug Oh look the jews are identifying with blood thirsty cannibalistic monsters again.
0
0
0
@GerryMcBride Bad angle. This will fundamentally shift how humans interact with media. Even if you hate it, from soon on forever “video evidence” will be devalued and production will have a cost of entry set to 0.
0
0
0
@gimmickannoying He would explain to them the burden of their sin, and if they refused to repent and (attempt) to sin no more they will never see heaven. “Unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.”
0
0
0
@SmoothDunk This is an odd vector of attack that isnt going to win you many friends or supporters. Pretty much everyone agrees you leave the kids out of it.
0
0
0
@mcsquared34 Communism taught us that only works once. You force the farmer to give up all his wheat, he doesnt have enough left to last the winter, he dies, and theres no wheat at all next year.
0
0
1
@LoesbyForIdaho @GoForChilly @max_millionair @ZoomerHistorian Needed? Didnt the greeks calculate the full function of the solar system down to the day for thousands of years out and create a mechanism to simulate it? Doesnt that imply they figured out a method to do it without 0? Sorry but Im not buying the idea they just didnt math wrong.
1
0
1
@LoesbyForIdaho @GoForChilly @max_millionair @ZoomerHistorian What my point is, is that it seems like the “invention” of 0 wasnt so much of a necessity as it was a convenience. If it was needed to do advanced mathmatics it would have been invented. We arent talking about a number system that didnt work. Romans were masters of advanced math.
2
0
1
@LoesbyForIdaho @GoForChilly @max_millionair @ZoomerHistorian They didnt do it like that most of the time though. They grouped everything into 10s, 100s, 1000s, etc. they just didnt indicate if there was a lack of a group. Also, nothing about what you shows demonstrates any intrinsic inaccuracy, just a matter of paper space.
1
0
2
@LoesbyForIdaho @GoForChilly @max_millionair @ZoomerHistorian Wait. Is there any math function in which using 0 does anything other than fuck all? I think no one invented it because it didnt matter. There wasnt really a function for super massive numbers until very recent history, and romans just did it by nesting numbers.
2
0
1