@Simulator_Free @men_are_human Kinky 😎

@Simulator_Free @men_are_human or:

@EvidencePlzz @MrStephenTee From what I have heard: Just like with patreon only a very few "creators" on OF earn a living solely from OF. The number of women in the greater business are very limited and make a decent wage but generally very short careers.

Effe lachen ...

Effe serieus ....

@jorisvaesen Gaat het sneller gaan als ik vraag: "wat bedoel je daarmee?"?

@EmileeLynette @ChristopherJM @SPE_Kellogg As things look now I'd assume the Krim should go to the USA.

@jorisvaesen @DOBBELAEREW Perfect bestaat niet.

@Blueblur2023 @mensrightsbunny Making (or threatening to make) false accusations is a form of abuse. Nearly all my exes have done so. In my life it is not the exception; it is the rule.

@BillboardChris This person called you a coward while you are speaking out for your believes. Delusional is the only word I know to describe anyone calling you a coward.

@SW6kicks @hewitson10 I know my grammar and spelling is bad. It always will be; no matter how much people point it out. It is painful and it can't be helped; but I do prefer that to low reading skills that can not be helped.

@SW6kicks @hewitson10 I prefer low grammar to low reading skills.

@SW6kicks @hewitson10 Keep doubling down.

@mvanromp @De7deDag @groen Het feit dat je die vraag stelt betekend dat je overgekwalificeerd bent.

@SW6kicks @hewitson10 Strange how you never seem to read what is being said.

@SW6kicks @hewitson10 Very funny as fox starts there coverage with a story. Probably the first story you heard.

@SW6kicks @hewitson10 The linked video is a great example of biased selection of data If the graph would include 1930 and 1931 the story would not be as inspiring as it is now. You can argue that the GD is not caused by the tariffs but; by excluding (and not mentioning) the GD FOX lost all credibility

@JMChiTownP4 @JoeLitt02838852 @TheMikeMorton @elonmusk Can you provide links to the source?

@JamesLNuzzo Your work deserves being cited.

@LedenUnor @LPofMN @arghavan_salles >There is a question of your initial attitude. That was indeed very sarcastically as there is no "Office for Men" so why would I care about a 1 of the 10 woman's offices getting less?