@MLSophist Just checking the vibes.

@JikiScott @ArtemisConsort You can do it, man! Escape your box! I know you can!

@tinaisolaillo @Sharon_Riley35 @elonmusk Cry about it.

You are arguing that some level of collaborative exchange is worse than none. Community notes are an attempt to support X's architecture to align more with collaboration in discussion. You also argue that "collective computation" won't yield truthful results, ironically arguing for the antithesis of truth. Do you honestly believe that the average person has such outlets for massive collaboration as this? If you truly understood the problem, you would be discussing solutions, not denouncing the attempt altogether. This reminds me of your opinion on climate change. You waste your words.

@GreerFried @boofchug @AndrewCSSN @InternetH0F Yeah, you're right.

@boofchug @AndrewCSSN @InternetH0F What happened in the middle makes no difference; you bought the cow for $800 and eventually sold it for $1,300.

@yacineMTB I've been to Stripe and Nordstrom offices, where tampons are in every bathroom. Stripe is the only one with gender-neutral signs on all bathrooms.

@RacismIsNotHate @iamyesyouareno This sounds like an ideological deflection; let's just agree that the post is racist or contend with the criticism at face value.

@skdh @jeremiahscholl For example...

@MLSophist @FussuV Fuck that; I actually need to get some shit done this year. Varr is the perfect reminder of "memento mori."

@essorensen @amasad I watched his videos when he was making them in his basement, and I watch them on occasion now because Asmongold brings them up. His content is trying to do too many things at once; it has lost its personality and become too disingenuous.

If this is a patsy, it is more likely that he was sent there, not knowing there was a bomb in his truck. Additionally, there was no real damage; this was obviously for the sake of optics. He had to be either willing to die for it as such a person could've just remotely triggered the bomb, or he was deceived by the coincidence of being there through coercion or undeceived coercion (hostage situation involving family). If there is no manifesto or death note, this will point even more heavily toward being a patsy, though one could be fabricated. The simplest of these possibilities is that there was a bomb planted in his truck, and somebody convinced him to drive to the Trump building. In this case, knowing if the bomb was remotely detonated or not would be the key to ruling this out and the autonomous driving scenario.

@pronounpal_ @JTWildesMiddle1 @Raw_Reporting It's called deductive reasoning, and it is quite healthy.

No way. Professor, you can, at a minimum, logic together and admit that banning vape but not cigarettes is a little contrary to the claimed goals and counterproductive. We are taking thousands of people addicted to nicotine and giving them two alternatives: smoke or quit cold turkey; this is obviously bad.

@ArtemisConsort That is how society finds truth, but the next step for the individual is to hold that confidence while placing that in the context of being wrong, glancing at the whole structure of ideas without holding a single solid position, and then coming back to that necessary confidence.

@JackPeters80 @notonmywatchfyi @FunOpener @Trump_NewsX I don't know about you, but Americans usually don't throw gay people off buildings, and "real" Americans don't chant "death to America."

@arithmoquine You are actually a terrible communicator; I'm not surprised this is your biggest regret on X. All you had to do was poll your audience with a simple question: "What is the furthest ring you give any moral consideration to?" Fourteen is my answer.

"Agent" implies a belief in a god or other spiritual entity. Either this is an inaccurate use of wording (in which case you would replace the word "agent" with "meme" or an equivalent), or you are claiming there is a tangible agent embodied within everyone that is god. You are claiming god is the collective agent, which originates from humanity's collective consciousness. The problem with this characterization is that it already appears in religious contexts and that labeling it a god would inherently mean you believe a god exists, hence, non-atheist.

@ArtemisConsort You can choose your thoughts within a range. The attention mechanism defines that range. What you attend to dictates who you become.