@kokayart Without doubt the most depressing paper I've worked on (so far!). Do you sell prints of that top-left illustration?

RT @IBIS_journal: Slender-billed Curlew are now extinct: Read all about it on #theBOUblog by @alexjb497, or check…

RT @juliapgjones: I reviewed the new book by @PaulREhrlich @GerardoCeballos and Dirzo in Nature. My take: this eloquent requiem for nature…

RT @hvangasteren: Hi UK, here they come! Huge start of bird migration from the Waddensea westwards. Currently an bird migration traffic rat…

@Alexander_Lees But they move southwards and winter much farther E. Personally I find it remarkable they've made it to the WP at all!

Short answer: I suspect very few.

I barely post on Tw*tter these days, but new paper published today with, and led by, Simon, looking at transmission pathways of HPAI.

RT @stubutchart: New paper shows impact of war in Ukraine on migrating Greater Spotted Eagles: birds made large deviations from traditional…

RT @olahgy: Australian #birds that have a high level of evolutionary distinctiveness, live on #islands, and unable to adapt to survive in a…

Fun day moping around the Cairngorms with dramatic scenery, pleasant weather and some fat snowball-like birds for company.

I've skipped a lot in the above, especially regarding ID, so encourage all those interested to download and read the full 'note', which ended up spiralling into 5,000 words of (fun) tediousness.

But there is no reason Plume-toed can't reach and fly around these higher elevations, so records should only be accepted (in our view) if birds are photographed at nest. In all, of the 766 records in eBird today, I'd say only a handful are admissible

But birds that have sporadically nested around Timpohon Gate (and higher) look to be Bornean, and indeed look really quite different to definite Plume-toed lower down the slope.

So what does this mean for registered records? Some bad news! All the Crocker birds look to us to be Plume-toed, as do all lower-elevation birds on Kinabalu. Lots of records to be scrapped.

Oft-mentioned differences in gloss shade are, in the field, probably useless. We also find possible bioacoustic differences, but the sample size is so small that we are cautious in them being overinterpreted until more data are collected.

Yes! Well, almost certainly yes. In addition to being considerably smaller (difficult to determine in the field), Bornean Swiftlet is duller, best shown by a comparative lack of contrast between the face and crown, and is also subtly different in breast pattern (details in paper)

Almost all these records are from various elevations of Mt Kinabalu, and increasingly the Crocker Range. We reviewed the five specimens of Bornean Swiftlet (all from Kinabalu) and compared to those of Plume-toed. So can Bornean be identified?

Literature often claims Bornean Swiftlet to be inseparable from Bornean pops of Plume-toed Swiftlet (with which it overlaps), but despite this there is an intriguing number of accepted records of Bornean Swiftlet on eBird/ML

Citizen science is awesome! And, with the review systems in place on platforms like @Team_eBird, is pretty accurate. But with some taxonomic groups, it is inevitable there are problems. We highlight this using one of the trickiest: Bornean Swiftlet Collocalia dodgei.