![Aidan Ryan Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1647005892213108739/x3P7hT9a_x96.jpg)
Aidan Ryan
@AidanRyan
Followers
755
Following
21K
Statuses
5K
I AM HERE YOU ARE NOT I LOVE YOU (@UIowaPress, spring 2025) | publisher @foundlingspress | senior editor https://t.co/O4bHYgAmKS | illstarred heresiarch
Buffalo, NY
Joined July 2009
Pre-orders are live! Get your copy of I Am Here You Are Not I Love You from @UIowaPress or ask your favorite bookstore to stock it. Books ship in April and the release date is May 16. I'll be posting about events etc. soon. And thank you for the support!
0
12
18
The Dems are not going to bring policy solutions. The party is over. Something else needs invade and reanimate the DNC host body the way MAGA replaced the irrelevant GOP. (And @jonstewart @RepJeffries Maya Angelou never said this. It was a Mormon elder named Carl Buehner.)
Jon Stewart asks why Democratic leaders think they need better messaging rather than better policies. House Leader Hakeem Jeffries replies their solution is "making the American people feel that we understand the pain that they've been in" — the exact thing Stewart was criticizing! JON STEWART: Where is the Democrats' Project 2025? The New DNC Chair kept saying it's a messaging issue, as though everything is going right, you just don't realize it yet. As opposed to, we've gotten away from New Deal values. HAKEEM JEFFRIES: Maya Angelou said it best — people won't remember what you say, they may not even remember what you do, but they will always remember how you make them feel. And I think what we have to do a better job of is making the American people feel that we understand the pain."
0
0
0
RT @foundlingspress: Listen to this beautiful, luminous conversation between @biancastone and Elizabeth Oehlkers Wright on the poet Franz W…
0
2
0
Columnists at @TheBuffaloNews always have commented on national political issues. That's the job of columnist. I don't think hand-wringing about the death of local news is any reason to continue to support this business. BN isn't dying--it's dead.
(Note: This 2nd portion of my submitted digital Buffalo News article today was not accepted for policy reasons involving local columnists dealing with national political issues. While I may disagree with that editorial call, the BN has the responsibility to set and observe such policies. So that my work and research were not for naught, here is what I'd written:) Federal Scrubbing of Climate Science Information is Ongoing It was announced a week ago that both the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of Agriculture had been ordered by the administration to remove all material related to a warming climate. Despite the irrefutable evidence of such warming and what’s causing it (this from a yet-undisturbed NASA climate website: , there appears to be a broad-based program to scrub many federal websites’ climate science related to anthropogenic warming, the driving force behind rising sea levels, more droughts in arid regions, more stronger hurricanes, more flooding in wet areas, more wildfires…and the like. Rather than relying on my individual hunting and pecking for NOAA climate websites, I’ve turned to a reliable, reviewed source with confirmed website statuses as of Thursday. The National Security Archive relies on journalists, scholars, and scientists to compile their information: As noted in this article, the Department of Defense nor NASA have not yet scrubbed most of their climate material: “Similarly, the Department of Defense’s website still includes a live and unchanged “Spotlight on Tackling the Climate Crisis,”[16] which states that DOD is “elevating climate change as a national security priority, integrating climate considerations into policies, strategies and partner engagements.” And although key climate information is still spread sporadically throughout the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) website, the agency’s climate website displays a message about moving to a “more integrated portal on science,” and the word “climate” is removed from its URL.” In the case of the DOD, the Navy has already had to spend billions to protect their vital facilities at major centers like Norfolk from rising sea levels, and has much more to do to protect national security at these coastal facilities. There have been reports in the last 2 days of Musk associates making sudden visits to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration headquarters on the College Park campus of the University of Maryland campus. Rumors have been in abundance that the administration has a goal of breaking up NOAA, but I personally have my doubts the popular services supplied by its best-known branch, the National Weather Service, would be completely broken up. This is an editorial statement from the Union of Concerned Scientists, a somewhat left-of-center association of distinguished scientists in many disciplines: It's a short, valuable read…especially if my doubts are misplaced: As a counterpoint to this, newly confirmed Secretary of Commerce Secretary Lutnick denies he has intentions of dismantling NOAA, which comes under his department: We can only hope this statement of intent stands the test of time.
0
2
1
You still can see one of Talia's new moveable prints (and another excellent piece) at @wnybook
0
1
5
Always free to submit, winner gets $250 and a @TaliaRyan128 broadside of their winning poem
The Ralph Angel Poetry Prize is back, with guest judge Gillian Conoley. Get your poems ready for submission in April!
0
7
11
RT @biancastone: The empty and utterly silent house filled all at once with the sound of my name posed, in my young mother's voice before I…
0
14
0
RT @bobdylan: Sorry to hear the news about Garth Hudson. He was a beautiful guy and the real driving force behind The Band. Just listen to…
0
3K
0
RT @rchlltrmn: not only does josh allen’s saturn return begin this year but he will enter the final of three peaks of his saturn sextile ju…
0
3
0