Adir Buskila
@AdirBuskila2
Followers
573
Following
240
Statuses
220
Father of 5 . Web3 entrepreneur . Founder of https://t.co/n6bcGAWqxA . Support and invest in interesting Web3 projects.
Israel
Joined November 2021
For investors that want to get into Ordinals, and understand what's the difference between a digital artifacts and NFT "Every Digital artifact is an NFT, but not every NFT is a digital artifact" (Casey Rodarmor) Enjoy.
4
2
25
Lol the initial message for the reach is actually written by a human... The AI takes the conversation from the first reply. So the AI actually talked only to 105 and people - 84/105 sent their pricing and looking forward to continuing👍💪 For everyone who is interested in a demo rechout and we will show you everything happily. 🥰
1
0
0
@cryptodogg420 To be accurate: 533 was reached 105 have replied 85 have sent the pricing That's a very nice rate👍
1
0
0
The Collabhub community is our free contribution to the growth of Web3! The Web3m platform is going all in on AI Agents - so much time and efforts can be saved. WEB3M is(and always will be) the pioneers of Web3 growth. Big things are cooking🤓🤓
Bottom line is : we are a startup, not only that we are passionate about what we do,our goal is to help growing this space and we are doing a lot to contribute to the overall growth of Web3 and in the same time we are developing a platform that solves problems in the data, ai and marketing fields on the industry. The experiment of our Influencer Recruiter Agent was a success, the agent has recruited 85 influencer to the campaign completely automatically - no human interaction needed. The lack of context for the question the influencer has presented has been solved. And we will continue to make experiments and build great products for all of you guys 😎 Take care🍺 cheers
0
3
5
Tldr of the issue: [A Convo with our Influencer recruiting agent] Web3m - "Hey we want to invite to speak in one of our live events, can you share us the pricing?" Influencer - "Sounds good what's the platform of the live event?" Web3m - "Its a live event which we are giving insight on web3 , can you share the pricing please?" Influencer - "what's the platform for the live event? If you're not answering that you are a scam!" Web3m - "it's a live event on online platform, we understand your concerns, if you have questions feel free to reach out." ........... [the influencer posted that we are 99.99% a scam ] ....... [We on a zoom meeting showing him the platform] Web3m - "you were talking to an agent as a part of experiment, it was lack of context for what you asked. We fixed it. But we are definitely not a scam, we have years of reputation" Influencer - "I'm convinced it's not a scam but 50 people agreed with me it looks like a scam" Web3m - "The agent talked to you on Twitter, inviting you to a live event... Our pinned tweet is Upcoming Twitter Spaces, this is literally all of our feed... It goes without saying that the platform for the live is Twitter Spaces" Influencer - "no that wasn't clear, I'll post a clearification it's not a scam but that this behavior is scammy" -------------- [Influencer posting an apology tweet] - they are not a scam, but their passion has blurred their judgment... Web3m - 😳 ------------------
1
0
2
Maybe... And your feedback is more than welcomed But that doesn't mean we are a scam... Let me teach you something: every successful startup fucked himself many times, until it got shit works. We tested on ourselves... No one was offered this, it's a small scale od messages within a trial. Let's continue this chat tomorrow. Seeya soon
1
0
1
@cryptodogg420 We tested it out... We are a marketing startup... And it actually wasn't so bad. Might need some touch to add validations for over suspicious people... Other than that seems like it did his job trying to get a quote out of you
1
0
0
Btw go back our feed you will find out that Gary vee invested in our company, I shared a video from his account on our Instagram and TikTok. Your "99.99%" just turned to "I jumped to conclusions too fast"... Btw we never asked anyone to connect their wallet or do something that might put them in risk... ever...
2
0
1
I wouldn't worry about a cryptographic catalyst coming from quantum computing. Let me tell you a short story... Once upon a time, back in 2016, there was a massive hack on a project called "The DAO" . A hacker drained 3.6m Eth tokens(~12b$ worth of eth today) . That was a massive hit to the credibility of Ethereum, back then it was a major catalyst and the community had a debate how to react: 1. To freeze the stolen assets by blacklisting the hackers wallet. 2. Revert the transaction by changing Ethereum source code. The community has devided by the two options, and both solutions exist until today: Ethereum classic represent option 1, While Ethereum represent option 2. The lesson from this story is that the community have a playbook for addressing catalyst from this type doesn't matter if the attacker used hacking or quantum hacking. once it's affecting everyone, it will affect no one. Remember that next time before worrying about quantum fud.
Chamath is so wrong. Google’s Willow, which has 105 physical qubits in a superconducting QC design ran an artificial quantum circuit design benchmark. They haven’t run Shor’s algorithm which is the issue for Bitcoin public-private key pair wallets and for our entire traditional financial infrastructure. Thousands of logical qubits, which means of order a million physical qubits, are needed to crack 256-bit ECDSA signatures due to extreme noisiness, especially found in this superconducting qubit based technology. They do have a better error suppression approach that scales all the way to 7x7 now. There are multiple quantum-safe alternatives for public-private key pairs already approved by NIST. In some years from now probably 5, worst case more likely 10, holdings will need to be moved to quantum-safe cryptographic wallets. Attacking the chain itself cannot be done by Shor’s, that requires a different algorithm, Grover’s for hashing, one could have quantum mining at some far future date. Willow has run neither a Shor’s benchmark nor a Grover’s benchmark. No QC has factored with Shor’s a number larger than 21 (sic). No QC has run Grover’s above 4 qubits from what I can see. Their work on reducing quantum noise and extending entanglement times to several tens of microseconds looks laudable. At @OrionX_net, with our HPC and supercomputing backgrounds, we have been following quantum computing for two decades. Follow @bensig on this, Ben, correct me if I have said something wrong here.
0
0
2
@masonic_tweets Interesting... how do you jump right to it with the client without getting defensive response
1
0
0
Web3m will be a game changer for every token economy project. Join now, thank me later😉
🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁 Big news! We merged Collabhub into the Web3M platform 🎉 Get ready for a blend of community engagement and data insights, all in one place. Take a look 👉 #Web3 #Web3Marketing #growth
0
0
0
@elonmusk @UAEmediaoffice @Israel the lvl of stupidity that goes here in the comment is embarrassing
0
0
0