@Asherr1984 @Welch140185Mac @PastUncensored @ThePrestonParra @PatrickBuchanan BTW I'm not claiming the US could have beaten Germany by themselves in WW2. The US wouldn't have had the political will to sustain the losses necessary to defeat a fully functional Wehrmacht.

@Asherr1984 @Welch140185Mac @PastUncensored @ThePrestonParra @PatrickBuchanan Didn't have the political will to deal with the losses necessary to achieve victory. They also couldn't cut off the supply of their enemy.

@Asherr1984 @Welch140185Mac @PastUncensored @ThePrestonParra @PatrickBuchanan You need both to win a war, obviously

@Asherr1984 @Welch140185Mac @PastUncensored @ThePrestonParra @PatrickBuchanan Soldiers can't fight if they aren't supplied properly. Supply lines are crucial to winning wars.

@Asherr1984 @Welch140185Mac @PastUncensored @ThePrestonParra @PatrickBuchanan Hitler allowed strategic withdrawals in Feb 43 to reassemble the German army groups. Soviets had a bad defeat to Manstein AFTER Stalingrad.

@Asherr1984 @Welch140185Mac @PastUncensored @ThePrestonParra @PatrickBuchanan Wrong, McMeekin has internal Soviet communications saying they were in danger of having their lines split at Kursk before the German offensive was called off due to Sicily.

@Asherr1984 @Welch140185Mac @PastUncensored @ThePrestonParra @PatrickBuchanan I will agree that the bombings of those places were war crimes.

@Asherr1984 @Welch140185Mac @PastUncensored @ThePrestonParra @PatrickBuchanan Also in 43 the Germans had mobilized so many men that they could have matched the Soviets in manpower if they weren't tied down on so many fronts. The allies kept the Germans from throwing their full might at the USSR.

@Asherr1984 @Welch140185Mac @PastUncensored @ThePrestonParra @PatrickBuchanan As I said, the allied landing in Sicily fucked the German chances at victory at Kursk in 43. The US was deliberately helping the Soviets, they weren't in any way neutral lol.

@Asherr1984 @Welch140185Mac @PastUncensored @ThePrestonParra @PatrickBuchanan Nope, they didn't pay back the vast majority of the aid (while the Brits did, which bankrupted them). And it was a trillion dollars (in today's money) of total aid.

@Asherr1984 @Welch140185Mac @PastUncensored @ThePrestonParra @PatrickBuchanan Plus the bombing of Germany prior to 44 by the US and UK. How can you leave that out? lol

@Welch140185Mac @PastUncensored @ThePrestonParra @PatrickBuchanan FDR was a Democrat, moron. He never tried to ally with NS Germany. He decided to ally with the murderous regime of Stalin instead. So criticize him for that!

@DavidBarbelo @PastUncensored @PatrickBuchanan What's he wrong about? Your tweet provided no examples.

@Welch140185Mac @PastUncensored @ThePrestonParra @PatrickBuchanan Nah, FDR and Churchill were just evil, that's why.

@julianddorey @LueElizondo I'm with Lue on this one. Putting out a fake pre-emptive cover story will just give suspicion and possibly lead other intelligence agencies to what you're really trying to cover up.

@zeetheunitato You're well on your way. Even those of us not brought up in dispensationalist zionism get it through the culture, so we all have to unlearn it to a certain degree.

@zeetheunitato So the jews do what they do because they don't accept Christ, so they can't accept what's been staring them in the face for 2,000 years. God stopped sending them prophets and destroyed their temple in 70 AD, the message should have been clear.