nom du pear 🍐 Profile Banner
nom du pear 🍐 Profile
nom du pear 🍐

@14JUN1995

Followers
8,638
Following
796
Media
1,073
Statuses
25,145

Transcendental Buffoon — world-historical ogre — One day we will be Yes-sayers

East, England
Joined October 2018
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Explore trending content on Musk Viewer
Pinned Tweet
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
5 years
Aim at being loved without being admired —Wittgenstein
19
60
380
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 months
Lovely find today
Tweet media one
10
54
2K
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
3 months
‘To be a philosopher you need only three things: Eros, attention, acceptance.’ Gillian Rose, Paradiso
Tweet media one
9
251
1K
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 years
Raymond Guess' advice for students reading Nietzsche:
Tweet media one
44
109
1K
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 months
Reading Wittgenstein write “all explanation must disappear, and description alone takes its place” reminds me of aphorism 112 in Nietzsche’s Gay Science, which itself reads as if Wittgenstein himself wrote it.
Tweet media one
24
123
1K
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
9 months
Freudian? Nietzschean? Hegelian? No. Shakespearean-Marxist.
Tweet media one
16
81
1K
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 years
Did Hegel understand himself
40
85
943
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
1 month
Yes and Fisher called Bergsonism the ideology of capitalism, Zizek says Deleuzianism is the ideology of capitalism, Adorno says Hegelianism is the ideology of capitalism, and now Nietzscheanism is the ideology of capitalism. I think this is a moronic argumentative point
@logarithmicVoid
Pseudogonal Triangle
1 month
Y'all heard this line about Spinozism being the ideology of Late Capitalism? Toscano notes that this could be amended to DeLanda and Cybernetics as well. Curious statement. Zizek-Badiou "Deleuzians are just advanced capitalists" kind of accusation. Todd McGowan says this often...
12
4
106
29
54
928
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
29 days
First of all, lmao. Second of all, why are these ‘Rightoids’ so intent on preserving Marx if they can’t even accept his basic premise??? Very strange
Tweet media one
46
18
791
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 years
Yes, I read philosophy.
Tweet media one
32
36
729
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
3 years
why is deleuze the only mf who is allowed to misinterpret somebody and still be considered a genius
53
34
703
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 years
Here's Adorno's hilarious view on diving straight in with difficult texts. The 'naive student' against the 'pedantry' of the teacher.
Tweet media one
10
104
666
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
1 year
if i could just be good at chess, learn another language or two, understand maths and science, read the entirety of world history and write some poems i think i’ll be fine
10
130
663
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
11 months
zizek is the worst thinker alive
73
44
629
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 years
Nietzsche is for Freudians who don’t like Freud, Schelling is for Hegelians who don’t like Hegel, Lacan is for Heideggerians who don’t like Heidegger, Adorno is for Lukácsians who don’t like Lukács, Aristotle is for Marxists who don’t like Marx,
21
47
633
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 years
philosophers be like: “it’s so hot 🥵 anybody got a theory of keeping cool i can read???”
9
35
606
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 years
French interpretations of Nietzsche: Nietzsche: return of the same! Deleuze: return of difference! Nietzsche: guilt is bad! Bataille: guilt is good! Nietzsche: asceticism is bad! Foucault: asceticism is good!
19
57
589
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
1 year
hegelians be like
Tweet media one
27
23
568
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
3 years
a 128 page introduction to a 23 page text by Derrida…
Tweet media one
16
36
573
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 years
Reading about how Althusser and Foucault thought it was too difficult to grade Derrida’s master’s dissertation is what I needed today — “either an F or an A+”
18
25
581
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 years
Tweet media one
6
51
573
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
3 years
“Kant was a critic of Reason” is the new “Marx was pro Capital”. This is what happens when the only primary reading you’ve done is the title and fill in the rest with hearsay.
20
58
551
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
5 months
Ethics is the worst area of philosophy. Neither philosophical nor political, just cope.
32
52
566
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
3 years
This is great. There should be more books like this. Let the next one be. . . Hegel?
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
25
42
547
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 years
philosophy is still team hegel v. team spinoza
42
30
509
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
18 days
Breaking news: the Hegelian e-girl council could not sublate their contradictions
@tenshi_anna
anna kw✨
19 days
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
128
16
502
10
17
524
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 months
“Schopenhauer and Kant” by Olaf Gulbransson
Tweet media one
8
61
520
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
1 month
much of the sickness that defines twitter philosophy can be diagnosed as youth
8
35
492
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 years
spinoza: “each man has as much right as he has power” 😍🥰🥹 nietzsche: “each man has as much right as he has power” 😡😤🤮
9
44
464
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
1 year
More books should be titled like these.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
Tweet media four
19
40
471
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
1 year
Another thing to blame Descartes: the existence of Elon Musk.
Tweet media one
5
68
441
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
1 year
psychoanalysis is enjoyable and that’s a problem
10
55
429
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
3 months
"I don't understand, therefore its wrong" or "non cogito, non sum"
@BenBurgis
Ben Burgis
3 months
My Derrida experience:
Tweet media one
31
15
226
19
22
408
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
1 year
One of the big disservices done to the likes of Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud is undermining or outright disavowing their commitment to *empirical* and experimental thinking, or their obsession with science.
12
27
397
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
8 months
The history of humanity in two books
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
9
22
384
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
5 months
An interviewer confronted Derrida with how difficult to read his books are, to which Derrida replied: the responsibility has to be shared, "the reading has to do its work and the work has to make its reader."
11
44
383
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
1 year
My Complete Works of Hegel I promised to read
@HowThingsWork_
H0W_THlNGS_W0RK
1 year
How old must these books be? 📔📔
733
1K
12K
1
22
355
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 months
As a Marxist I don’t believe in ontology, as a Nietzschean I don’t believe in morality, as a Freudian I don’t believe in religion
30
20
358
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
10 months
Some nighttime reading. A history of Shakespeare-reception among the intellectual Right in Germany from Nietzsche to Carl Schmitt.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
6
33
350
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 months
if you can read a book quickly it’s not worth studying
14
16
352
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
1 year
I've been thinking about starting a reading group on Nietzsche's Ecce Homo, a book that is solitary, short, and brutish. It would be weekly meetings for about 10 weeks. I'll provide some further details soon, just trying to see if theres any interest.
46
14
348
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
8 months
What annoys me about online Marxists is how they engage the history of ideas as a sum of readymade propositions one accepts and adopts. But this is not how you engage with a thinker imo. Look not for answers but the problems they raise.
15
24
344
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 years
Zarathustra left his home at 30 to go live in a cave for ten years in solitude. What are you doing?
11
32
324
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
3 years
philosophy books, on sale, never read.
Tweet media one
20
16
320
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
11 months
‘The Christian, who believes he has killed his sensuality, is deceiving himself: it lives on in an uncanny vampire [unheimliche vampyrische] form and torments him in repulsive disguises.’ Nietzsche
6
31
319
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
1 year
Derrida-enjoyer says Derrida is right. Foucault-enjoyer says Foucault is right.
18
19
310
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 years
Gramsci’s famous motto ‘pessimism of the intellect, optimism of the will’ was taken from Romain Rolland who had taken it from Jacob Burckhardt’s description of the Greeks — which Nietzsche read to his friends in Sorrento 1876.
Tweet media one
3
21
307
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
9 months
Reading this. Mitchell and Rose do such a good job minimising jargon that I think to myself “hey, this Lacan fella ain’t so bad.” I’m not totally swayed however!
Tweet media one
8
10
296
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
8 months
four philosophy books i want to read this year (month)
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
Tweet media four
@moonbeeaam
anna
8 months
four philosophy books i want to read this year
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
Tweet media four
6
11
327
8
12
294
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 months
Rereading this. It’s an exciting and worthy challenge to Freudian psychoanalysis but I do think it misses the mark in some instances. Would like to know if anyone has critically responded to it
Tweet media one
18
14
302
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
7 months
Fichte’s essay titles are undefeated: “A Crystal Clear Report to the General Public Concerning the Actual Essence of the Newest Philosophy: An Attempt to Force the Reader to Understand”
11
30
297
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
7 months
need to form an alliance with fellow nerds working on the intersection of science, math, art, philosophy, politics
29
19
287
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 years
Freud — ‘It would be a mistake to suppose that a science consists entirely of strictly proved theses. Only a disposition with a passion for authority will raise such a demand, someone with a craving to replace their religious catechism by another [i.e. science].’
5
48
284
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
8 months
Funny that the English word “dwell” does a much better job than Heidegger’s use of the German word “Wohnen” for describing the fact of being-in-the-world and of thinking.
14
13
294
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
5 months
I’d say reading Kant’s three critiques in all it’s successes, failures, contradictions is much more philosophically productive than reading Hegel. 🎂
16
16
292
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
9 months
I’ll take Heidegger’s obscurity over this
5
20
279
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
1 year
The one conspiracy theory I believe? Engels read Nietzsche
7
21
273
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
1 year
Such a fascinating passage on Zarathustra.
Tweet media one
5
22
282
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
18 days
You can extend Freud’s diagnosis of psychobabble to apply to philosophy (theorybabble). The real lesson is that muddled jargon is a symptom of the *pleasure of thinking* itself expressed by word-play + overdetermined vocabulary. Work-through the enjoyment of your own speech!
8
16
279
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
1 year
Which Philosopher Are You Quiz Do you think God is dead? Do you think the world is all and that is the case? Do you think esse est percipi? Do you like rhizomes?
5
14
259
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
7 months
The Romans knew that wit is a prophetic faculty; they called it nose — F. Schlegel If all things turned to smoke, the nose would distinguish them — Heraclitus My genius is in my nostrils — Nietzsche
9
31
268
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
1 year
The irony of Zizek writing yet another column on ChatGPT is that you could use ChatGPT to perfectly predict what Zizek has to say about ChatGPT.
8
16
265
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
5 months
hegel in my head, marx in my heart, heidegger in my hands, nietzsche in my feet, lukács in my arse
8
10
269
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
10 months
After contemplating Spinoza’s determinism Fichte says “depression and dread gnawed at my insides”
6
25
255
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
1 year
Adorno approves
Tweet media one
1
24
259
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
5 months
PhD-er’s: how were you so sure what topic to write about?
57
11
252
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
1 year
abolish philosophy now
13
39
238
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
6 months
The task of critique is to point out the crisis hitherto lain buried in the order of things (Benjamin)
4
53
242
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
7 months
This comes right after Marx referring to political economy as a ‘science of asceticism’
Tweet media one
@spencerbeswick
Spencer Beswick
7 months
Marx: "The less you eat, drink and read books; the less you go to the theatre, the dance hall, the public house; the less you think, love, theorize, sing, paint... etc., the more you save—the greater becomes your treasure which neither moths nor dust will devour—your capital. 1/2
6
406
2K
3
39
242
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
11 months
Reading Lukács. Adorno would agree that literature ‘reflects’ social life, but views modernist lit from a negative or symptomatic pov, i.e., that Kafka and Baudelaire can still say something profound and true about social life without having to agree with them ideologically.
1
19
237
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
7 months
What are some instances of critical theorists talking about painting? It seems quite rare to me idk
102
5
234
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
3 years
My fav criticism of Descartes' "I think" is still Nietzsche's, who says something like: you are a thing which thinking passes through, nothing says the thoughts we have are, strictly speaking, ours
7
24
238
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
11 days
Marx is barely a philosopher, let alone a moral one
28
9
241
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
1 year
If ‘Zizekianism’ exists it would have existed by now, but it doesn’t. Derrida was just as popular and in his own lifetime there were wannabe deconstructionists
34
2
230
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
1 year
What German Idealists called intellectual intuition Freud called narcissism
5
27
233
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
1 year
The gods of Oxfam have blessed me
Tweet media one
7
5
217
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
7 months
Best book I’ve read in a while — The romantic project deserves it’s due!
Tweet media one
@VersoBooks
Verso Books
7 months
What are you reading this weekend?
32
1
40
13
10
225
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 months
Being forced to read an entire book in one week just to spend a single session discussing it is ridiculous to me. If a book is worth being read in full, then it’s worth discussing it over many weeks.
6
11
223
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
29 days
sudden rise of right hegelians doing left nietzscheans a real solid 😮‍💨
7
13
226
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
4 months
i’m a cat dad now
Tweet media one
13
2
216
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 years
Marxists are bad philosophers. Philosophers are bad Marxists. Sorry!
12
20
214
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
3 months
i turned 29 today. how long left until i have to write my magnum opus?
29
10
216
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 years
Žižek will be better received a decade or so after he dies, unsurprisingly. Makes me wonder when the first biography of him will be written and who will write it.
18
5
213
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
6 months
I don’t read much poetry, but I wondered today whether there are examples of poems that reference or even quote other poems? That seems quite neat to me
42
6
215
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 years
I’m reading a lot of ‘Nietzsche was actually a Christian thinker’ (Löwith, Eagleton) but what if Christianity is just Nietzschean?
32
14
206
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 years
celebrating nietzsche’s birthday by having a headache and resenting work
1
24
209
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
9 months
If I’m reading this correctly, Heidegger makes the incredible claim that his view on the self-estrangement of humanity from the truth of Being is closer to Marxism than are either Sartre or Husserl close to Marxism.
Tweet media one
13
16
209
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
4 months
Nick Land wrote his PhD on Heidegger supervised by David Farrell Krell? Wow
12
12
208
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
9 months
My article “Nietzsche, Nihilism and the Crisis of Piety” is finally published. It frames Nietzsche’s understanding of nihilism as a response to the pantheist controversy and the assassination of Tsar Alexander II.
Tweet media one
7
26
200
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 months
This is a good example of the arbitrariness of ‘analytic phil’. The problem of the ‘meaning of life’ is not one puzzle among others but forms how we think/solve puzzles as such. Not wanting to answer the puzzle of life requires limiting oneself to what can/ought be thought
@izzitrin
miss missouri since your goodbye
2 months
am i crazy to think that it’s ok to just do analytic philosophy bc you like to solve puzzles. why do we all need to answer questions about the meaning of life
46
23
489
6
13
207
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
27 days
It’s not whether ‘Aufheben’ can mean both abolish and preserve but whether, as Marx understood it, social contradictions can be finally dissolved. What you want is a McGowan-type Lacanian–Hegelianism where contradiction is both constitutive and necessary for social life
@returntohegel
Nikki the Hegelian
28 days
Leftists don’t want to admit the truth. “Aufheben” doesn’t only mean “abolish.” Their inability to grasp the contradictions is the issue.
Tweet media one
20
3
132
7
11
208
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 years
I have the feeling that interest in Lacan is declining and will cease in a few years
34
2
196
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
3 years
“I am busy reading Hegel’s Logic again, a truly astonishing work, which speaks to me today in every one of its parts.” From Adorno’s letter to Benjamin
4
15
190
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
3 years
finished. very cool book. would recommend. including the first? footnote that made me laugh
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
4
10
189
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
25 days
I’m looking to make a short list of works of conspiratorial fiction, I’ve got Eco and Pynchon — who else?
59
6
192
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
29 days
I mean seriously, what is the philosophical/political upshot of their wanting to retain a commitment to Marx/ism even if they themselves simply don’t want to admit they disagree with his project
6
2
192
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
4 months
A copy of Heidegger’s lecture “Was is das—die Philosophie” given in 1955 in Cerisy-la-Salle. Hosted by Jean Beaufret and attended by the likes of René Char, Deleuze. Lacan. Kostas Axelos also acted as interpreter.
Tweet media one
3
14
184
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 years
Lacanians who don’t understand Hegel 🤝 Hegelians who don’t understand Lacan
9
15
177
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
11 months
Foucault won
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
11 months
spending tonight finally reading the derrida-foucault debate on descartes and madness
7
1
121
9
4
181
@14JUN1995
nom du pear 🍐
2 years
Why did Deleuze hate Hegel so much
45
7
176