zkSyncDevs Profile Banner
ZKsync Developers (∎, ∆) Profile
ZKsync Developers (∎, ∆)

@zkSyncDevs

Followers
21K
Following
693
Statuses
807

Developer and status updates for the @ZKsync Era network.

Joined November 2021
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@zkSyncDevs
ZKsync Developers (∎, ∆)
4 months
Nothing beats meeting builders IRL and jamming on the new era of zkApps. We can't wait to cowork with y'all again at the next Era zkafé ☕️. Some highlights from @token2049 🇸🇬.
24
12
118
@zkSyncDevs
ZKsync Developers (∎, ∆)
11 hours
If you have any questions or need assistance, join the discussion here:
0
0
3
@zkSyncDevs
ZKsync Developers (∎, ∆)
11 hours
Why is this changing? This update aligns contractAddress behavior more closely with Ethereum (which doesn’t have a ContractDeployer). This is a breaking change in the RPC, so we’re giving teams a heads-up before mainnet deployment.
1
0
4
@zkSyncDevs
ZKsync Developers (∎, ∆)
11 hours
The deployment doesn’t need to be successful for contractAddress to be set. The address is derived from the transaction and, in some cases, storage data (e.g., deployment nonce).
1
0
3
@zkSyncDevs
ZKsync Developers (∎, ∆)
11 hours
What’s changing? •Previously, contractAddress was set to the last contract deployed in a transaction, even if the deployment was triggered by another contract. •Now, it will only be set for deployment transactions—defined as calls to ContractDeployer.{create, create2, createAccount, create2Account}.
1
0
4
@zkSyncDevs
ZKsync Developers (∎, ∆)
11 hours
When will this be deployed on ZKsync Era mainnet? TBD. We’ll share updates as we get closer.
1
0
5
@zkSyncDevs
ZKsync Developers (∎, ∆)
1 day
2025 isn’t just about new features. It’s about changing how we work. More accountability. Less guesswork. We just dropped a detailed blog post covering all our plans for this year. Read more here →
0
1
6
@zkSyncDevs
ZKsync Developers (∎, ∆)
2 days
Consensus is available to all ZK Chains today if they configure their nodes to use it. If you have any questions, leave a comment below!
0
1
29