Jack Miller
@twrjack
Followers
354
Following
5K
Statuses
6K
Husband, father, grandfather; Reformed & Catholic Confessions; 1662 BCP IE. *Your disqualification is your qualification* - 1 Tim 1:15
Joined September 2021
@threadreaderapp , could you roll this thread? Thanks
🧵THE UNIPARTY UNMASKED – They Believe They Are “Democracy” The seven NGOs in the chart below, in my view, represent the Uniparty. Each of these organizations receives substantial financial support from USAID or the Department of State. Around 2019, the phrase “democracy in danger” began to dominate public discourse, amplified by the media. This was odd—after all, the U.S. is a democracy (or more precisely, a constitutional republic). But as I traced the influence of these NGOs, a pattern emerged: they are controlled by establishment politicians, they play a major role in shaping political narratives worldwide, and their core mission is always framed as “protecting democracy.” Originally, these NGOs were created to support U.S. democratic efforts abroad—many of them emerging during the Cold War to combat the spread of communism. But with the fall of the Soviet Union, their original purpose faded. Instead of dissolving, they redefined their mission. Now, they have positioned themselves as the guardians of democracy itself. This shift explains why Trump’s re-election was framed as a "threat to democracy." To these NGOs, “democracy” means themselves. Their survival depends on maintaining that role, and any challenge to their authority is perceived as a direct attack on democracy itself.
1
0
0
RT @RefDogmatika: [The Lord’s Supper] adds to the effectiveness of the Word, and therefore to the measure of the grace received. —Louis B…
0
16
0
@MZHemingway Mollie do you have, or anyone else, the original announcement of congratulations by Wheaton?
0
0
0
RT @SteveHiltonx: I went to Congress to tell Jerry Nadler and his Democrats - it's not "climate" that's responsible for the L.A. wildfire d…
0
3K
0
@WalterRight_x2 @ULTRA_MAJESTY @DataRepublican Help me here… Where in the link is it shown that NFF received half a billion from USAID
1
0
2
Just a really bad idea no matter who would head up the White House Faith Office.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: "This week, I am also creating the White House Faith Office led by Pastor Paula White."
1
0
4
At this point I admit that I jumped too soon. Grok: There is no credible evidence that Ben Stiller received taxpayer money from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) for his humanitarian trip to Ukraine. Recent reports have clarified that claims made on social media about Stiller receiving $4 million from USAID are false. Ben Stiller himself has denied these allegations, stating explicitly on his social media that he self-funded his trip and received no funding or personal payments from USAID. This was also supported by community notes on the platform correcting misinformation. Therefore, the best evidence on this matter points to Stiller not having received any taxpayer money for his activities related to Ukraine.
0
0
0
It’s tough to say… I may have jumped to soon. But like I said, we’ll see… from Grok: Ben Stiller has publicly stated that he completely self-funded his humanitarian trip to Ukraine and denied receiving any funding from USAID or any personal payments for his visit. These statements were made in response to claims circulating on social media and reported by various news outlets that he was paid $4 million for his trip. However, there are contrasting claims from posts on X and some media reports suggesting that USAID did fund celebrity visits, including Stiller's, to Ukraine. These reports claim that such funding was part of efforts to boost support for Ukraine amid its conflict with Russia. Given this, here's a breakdown: - **Stiller's Position:** He has explicitly denied these claims, stating they are "lies coming from Russian media" and that his trip was entirely self-funded. - **Opposing Claims:** Some media and social media posts assert that celebrities, including Stiller, were paid by USAID for their visits, with specific allegations of a $4 million payment to Stiller. The validity of these claims is muddled by the nature of social media, where misinformation can spread rapidly, and by the fact that official statements from Stiller directly contradict these allegations. Furthermore, the reliability of some of the sources claiming payments varies, with some appearing to push specific political narratives or lacking corroborative evidence. Therefore, without concrete evidence beyond conflicting reports and statements, it's challenging to conclusively determine whether Stiller received $4 million. The most direct information we have is Stiller's denial of any such payment. However, the broader context of celebrity involvement in political and humanitarian efforts in conflict zones can be complex, involving various forms of support or perceived endorsements that might not always be financially transparent.
0
0
1
@RWurzburg @BenStiller Russian media? The Admin claims it has receipts. I guess we’ll see about this and the many other revelations of USAID financing political operations when the dust settles. 🧐
0
0
0
