@QuantumHawk666
@TrueBluntMaster
@rhythmbw
@BRijswijk
@AtheistPhoenix
You can say that, but I’m not the one with no evidence for my theory of origin.
Your theory has natural origin, and by definition, theories regarding the natural world require empirical evidence for the theory to be considered plausible.
But it doesn’t, so it isn’t.
@rebmoti
@MichaelEMann
The term 'anti-vax' can be an extremely dishonest, manipulative word. The right to practice informed consent in the wake of unproven, dangerous drugs is not necessarily being against vac*ines. It is more of a demand that high standards of safety and efficacy be a public right.
Changing the DNA in people will make them ineligible for salvation.
The reason is that they are no longer made in the image of God but have become a hybrid.
This is another one of Satan’s plans.
@QuantumHawk666
Kiddo, I said as old as the best guess science has.
It isn't enough. And that's before the complete lack of evidence for anything transitional. Even less than Darwin thought he had.
Dead. Theory. It has been for 40 yrs. People just say it out loud now.
@trekkiebill
There is nothing wrong with owning pagan slaves as long as you treat them well. Whipping them as punishment for breaking the law or disobeying is completely fine as long as it doesn't maim or kill them.
It's not necessarily cruel or wicked, you just have a woman's bleeding heart.
@SebGorka
So you don't understand either.
Including that the 2nd law refers to a closed system.
Evolution doesn't violate this.
An incapability to understand evolution is not an argument against it
@JTPeterson34
@thatssocheeky
Lolz, evolution is a fact, backed by multitudes of science across many disciplines.
But go on what's your best alternate explanation for the diversity of life on earth, past and present.